Correlation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Imaging and the Difference of Molecular Subtypes Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens

Dandan Wang,Yating Li,Hui Sun,Chaoli Xu,Bin Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1553451/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: Core needle biopsy (CNB) and automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) play crucial roles in diagnosing breast cancer. However, the molecular subtype of breast cancer in CNB and surgery is a paradox at times. Analyzing the correlation between ABVS and the difference of molecular subtypes between CNB and surgery specimens has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of ABVS imaging that affect the discrepancy of molecular subtypes between CNB and surgical specimens in breast cancer patients.Methods: Eighty-two breast cancer patients (83 lesions) who underwent ABVS examinations were enrolled at Jinling Hospital between November 2014 to October 2020. The molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B (HER-2 positive), luminal B (HER-2 negative), HER-2 overexpression, and triple-negative subtypes) and the discrepancy rate of the specimens via CNB and surgery were determined. The clinicopathological and ABVS imaging features were compared between the discrepancy group (molecular subtypes were different between CNB and surgery specimens) and the consistency group (molecular subtypes were concordant between CNB and surgery specimens). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the diagnostic performance of the significant features. Results: Of the 83 lesions, a concordance rate of 73.5% (κ=0.64) was shown between the CNB specimens and the surgical specimens for molecular subtypes. The presence of clear boundary, irregular shape, well-defined margin, and no retraction phenomenon on ABVS were independently associated with discrepancy in molecular subtypes (all P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combination of these four features on ABVS was 0.9 (95% CI:0.8-0.9), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 41%, respectively.Conclusions: ABVS is feasible with excellent sensitivity in determining the discrepancy of molecular subtypes between specimens via CNB and surgery. Multipoint puncture during CNB should be advocated for the lesions with the presence of clear boundary, irregular shape, well-defined margin, and lack of retraction phenomenon, thus leading to avoidance of discrepancy in molecular subtypes in clinical diagnosis and treatment processes in breast cancer patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?