Abstract:AIM: To investigate the performance of combined semi-quantitative analysis on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing malignant from benign breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 178 patients with breast masses (benign: malignant=88:9) who underwent both DCE-MRI and DWI. The semi-quantitative parameters, derived from DCE-MRI, included maximum slope of increase (MSI), signal intensity slope (SIslope), initial percentage of enhancement (E-initial), percentage of peak enhancement (E-peak), early signal enhancement ratio (ESER), and second enhancement percentage (SEP). Histogram parameters derived from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps included ADC(min), ADC(max), ADC(mean), ADC(10), ADC(25), ADC(50,) ADC(75), ADC(90), skewness, and kurtosis. All parameters were compared between malignant and benign groups, and their differences were tested using independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the diagnostic value of each significant parameter. RESULTS: Among semi-quantitative parameters, SIslope exhibited the best diagnostic performance in predicting malignancy (cut-off value, 0.096; ROC, 0.756; sensitivity, 86.7%; specificity, 61.4%). Among histogram parameters, ADC(10) exhibited the best diagnostic performance in predicting malignancy (cut-off value, 1.051; ROC, 0.885; sensitivity, 86.7%; specificity, 84.1%). The optimal diagnostic performance of combined ADC(10) and SIslope (area under curve [AUC], 0.888; sensitivity, 82.2%; specificity, 95.5%) was significantly better than SIslope alone (p<0.001). Moreover, the combination showed higher AUC (0.888 versus 0.885) than ADC(10) alone, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.914). CONCLUSION: SIslope and ADC(10) are significant predictors for breast malignancy. The combination of DCE-MRI and DWI improves differentiating performance. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Quantitative Assessment of Breast Density: Comparison of Different Methods

Breast Density Measurement Methods on Mammograms: a Review

Comparative Study on the Density of Breast Cancer by Ultrasound, Mammography and MRI

A level set based framework for quantitative evaluation of breast tissue density from MRI data

Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis

Cross-Field Strength and Multi-Vendor Validation of MagDensity for MRI-based Quantitative Breast Density Analysis

SU‐FF‐I‐140: Cone Beam Breast CT Versus Mammography for Breast Density Measurement

Mammographic Density Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Comparison with Automated Volumetric Assessment

Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences

Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement

Automated Mammographic Risk Classification Based On Breast Density Estimation

Characteristics of Mammographic Breast Density and Associated Factors for Chinese Women: Results from an Automated Measurement

Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset

Deep-LIBRA: Artificial intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment

Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning

Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Breast Masses: Combination of Semi-Quantitative Analysis on DCE-MRI and Histogram Analysis of ADC Maps

Association between mammogram density and background parenchymal enhancement of breast MRI.

Estimation of Breast Density: an Adaptive Moment Preserving Method for Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue in Breast Magnetic Resonance Images

Automated breast density assessment for full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

Classifying Mammographic Breast Density by Residual Learning

Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks