Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Automated measurement and classification models with objectivity and reproducibility are required for accurate evaluation of the breast cancer risk of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a machine‐learning algorithm for breast FGT segmentation and BPE classification.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>Retrospective.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Population</h3><p>A total of 794 patients with breast cancer, 594 patients assigned to the development set, and 200 patients to the test set.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequence</h3><p>3T and 1.5T; T<sub>2</sub>‐weighted, fat‐saturated T<sub>1</sub>‐weighted (T<sub>1</sub>W) with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>Manual segmentation was performed for the whole breast and FGT regions in the contralateral breast. The BPE region was determined by thresholding using the subtraction of the pre‐ and postcontrast T<sub>1</sub>W images and the segmented FGT mask. Two radiologists independently assessed the categories of FGT and BPE. A deep‐learning‐based algorithm was designed to segment and measure the volume of whole breast and FGT and classify the grade of BPE. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) and Spearman correlation analysis were used to compare the volumes from the manual and deep‐learning‐based segmentations. Kappa statistics were used for agreement analysis. Comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) and F1 scores were calculated to evaluate the performance of BPE classification.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The mean (±SD) DSC for manual and deep‐learning segmentations was 0.85 ± 0.11. The correlation coefficient for FGT volume from manual‐ and deep‐learning‐based segmentations was 0.93. Overall accuracy of manual segmentation and deep‐learning segmentation in BPE classification task was 66% and 67%, respectively. For binary categorization of BPE grade (minimal/mild vs. moderate/marked), overall accuracy increased to 91.5% in manual segmentation and 90.5% in deep‐learning segmentation; the AUC was 0.93 in both methods.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Conclusion</h3><p>This deep‐learning‐based algorithm can provide reliable segmentation and classification results for BPE.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Level of Evidence</h3><p>3</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical Efficacy Stage</h3><p>2</p></section>

Intraindividual Comparison of Different Methods for Automated BPE Assessment at Breast MRI: A Call for Standardization

Comparison between qualitative and quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI

Comparison of Radiologist-Assigned Categories and Quantitative Measures of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI

Automated rating of background parenchymal enhancement in MRI of extremely dense breasts without compromising the association with breast cancer in the DENSE trial

Fully automatic quantification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement with accurate implementation for axial and sagittal breast MRI protocols

Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment

Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI

Computerized assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI including electronic lesion removal

Factors Influencing Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Images

Standardization of Breast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Signal with Application to the Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Rate

Automated Quantification of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Longitudinal Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Predicting Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer

The Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) in a High-Risk Population: What Causes BPE?

Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk

Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Categorization Using Deep Learning: Outperforming the Radiologist

Fully Automatic Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI Using Machine‐Learning Models

Comparison of the background echotexture between automated breast ultrasound and handheld breast ultrasound

Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI predicts response to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: preliminary evaluation in a cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

Machine Learning Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Cancer and Clinical Applications: A Literature Review

A level set based framework for quantitative evaluation of breast tissue density from MRI data

BPE and computer-extracted parenchymal enhancement for breast cancer risk, response monitoring, and prognosis

Fibroglandular Tissue and Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MR Imaging Correlates With Breast Cancer