Evaluation of Various Methods of Liver Measurement in Comparison to Volumetric Segmentation Based on Computed Tomography

Maciej Cebula,Angelika Biernacka,Oskar Bożek,Bartosz Kokoszka,Sylwia Kazibut,Anna Kujszczyk,Monika Kulig-Kulesza,Sandra Modlińska,Jakub Kufel,Michał Azierski,Filip Szydło,Mateusz Winder,Joanna Pilch-Kowalczyk,Katarzyna Gruszczyńska
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133634
IF: 3.9
2024-06-22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: A reliable assessment of liver volume, necessary before transplantation, remains a challenge. Our work aimed to assess the differences in the evaluation and measurements of the liver between independent observers and compare different formulas calculating its volume in relation to volumetric segmentation. Methods: Eight researchers measured standard liver dimensions based on 105 abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Based on the results obtained, the volume of the liver was calculated using twelve different methods. An independent observer performed a volumetric segmentation of the livers based on the same CT examinations. Results: Significant differences were found between the formulas and in relation to volumetric segmentation, with the closest results obtained for the Heinemann et al. method. The measurements of individual observers differed significantly from one another. The observers also rated different numbers of livers as enlarged. Conclusions: Due to significant differences, despite its time-consuming nature, the use of volumetric liver segmentation in the daily assessment of liver volume seems to be the most accurate method.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?