Abstract:Purpose/ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of image coregistration of PET-CT images in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and investigate the impact of PET-CT image coregistration on radiation treatment planning.Materials/Methods13 patients with well-circumscribed non-small cell lung cancer lesions were examined by in-lined PET-CT. The registration accuracy of PET-CT were measured with two methods?volume measure and center of geometry (COG) measure. The volume of interest of each lesion was defined separately on PET, CT and fused images, VPET, VCT, VPET+CT. The overlap volume of PET and CT images was calculated with formula: VPET-CT=VPET+VCT-VPET+CT. The percentage of VPET-CT on VPET+CT, PPET-CT was used to assess the fusion accuracy of PET and CT images. The geometric center of gravity (COG) of VPET and VCT was assessed. The distance of COGs between the PET image and the CT images, DCOG was measured. The image data were transferred to the radiation treatment planning system. Three plans were performed according to different volume, VPET, VCT, VPET+CT, with a prescribed dose of 60Gy. The dose of lung, heart and spinal cord were recorded in plans and compared with each other.ResultsThe mean of DCOG was .95mm ± 2.41mm(1.00mm ∼8.68mm). PPET-CT was 46.69 ± 19.21%(2.65%∼70.41%). Misregistration tended to be more pronounced in the lower lungs (n = 7, DCOG=4.73mm ± 2.50mm, PPET-CT=52.00% ± 23.62%) than in the upper lungs (n = 6, DCOG=5.21mm ± 2.51mm, PPET-CT=49.49% ± 11.40%) (P > 0.05). The doses to lung (mean lung dose and V20) and maximal doses to spinal cord and heart were higher in plans according to the VPET+CT than in those according to the VPET and VCT(P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference among the mean doses to heart and spinal cord in three plans (P > 0.05). The data were shown in the table 1(table 1).Conclusions Purpose/ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of image coregistration of PET-CT images in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and investigate the impact of PET-CT image coregistration on radiation treatment planning. To evaluate the accuracy of image coregistration of PET-CT images in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and investigate the impact of PET-CT image coregistration on radiation treatment planning. Materials/Methods13 patients with well-circumscribed non-small cell lung cancer lesions were examined by in-lined PET-CT. The registration accuracy of PET-CT were measured with two methods?volume measure and center of geometry (COG) measure. The volume of interest of each lesion was defined separately on PET, CT and fused images, VPET, VCT, VPET+CT. The overlap volume of PET and CT images was calculated with formula: VPET-CT=VPET+VCT-VPET+CT. The percentage of VPET-CT on VPET+CT, PPET-CT was used to assess the fusion accuracy of PET and CT images. The geometric center of gravity (COG) of VPET and VCT was assessed. The distance of COGs between the PET image and the CT images, DCOG was measured. The image data were transferred to the radiation treatment planning system. Three plans were performed according to different volume, VPET, VCT, VPET+CT, with a prescribed dose of 60Gy. The dose of lung, heart and spinal cord were recorded in plans and compared with each other. 13 patients with well-circumscribed non-small cell lung cancer lesions were examined by in-lined PET-CT. The registration accuracy of PET-CT were measured with two methods?volume measure and center of geometry (COG) measure. The volume of interest of each lesion was defined separately on PET, CT and fused images, VPET, VCT, VPET+CT. The overlap volume of PET and CT images was calculated with formula: VPET-CT=VPET+VCT-VPET+CT. The percentage of VPET-CT on VPET+CT, PPET-CT was used to assess the fusion accuracy of PET and CT images. The geometric center of gravity (COG) of VPET and VCT was assessed. The distance of COGs between the PET image and the CT images, DCOG was measured. The image data were transferred to the radiation treatment planning system. Three plans were performed according to different volume, VPET, VCT, VPET+CT, with a prescribed dose of 60Gy. The dose of lung, heart and spinal cord were recorded in plans and compared with each other. ResultsThe mean of DCOG was .95mm ± 2.41mm(1.00mm ∼8.68mm). PPET-CT was 46.69 ± 19.21%(2.65%∼70.41%). Misregistration tended to be more pronounced in the lower lungs (n = 7, DCOG=4.73mm ± 2.50mm, PPET-CT=52.00% ± 23.62%) than in the upper lungs (n = 6, DCOG=5.21mm ± 2.51mm, PPET-CT=49.49% ± 11.40%) (P > 0.05). The doses to lung (mean lung dose and V20) and maximal doses to spinal cord and heart were higher in plans according to the VPET+CT than in those according to the VPET and VCT(P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference among the mean doses to heart and spinal cord in three plans (P > 0.05). The data were shown in the table 1(table 1). The mean of DCOG was .95mm ± 2.41mm(1.00mm ∼8.68mm). PPET-CT was 46.69 ± 19.21%(2.65%∼70.41%). Misregistration tended to be more pronounced in the lower lungs (n = 7, DCOG=4.73mm ± 2.50mm, PPET-CT=52.00% ± 23.62%) than in the upper lungs (n = 6, DCOG=5.21mm ± 2.51mm, PPET-CT=49.49% ± 11.40%) (P > 0.05). The doses to lung (mean lung dose and V20) and maximal doses to spinal cord and heart were higher in plans according to the VPET+CT than in those according to the VPET and VCT(P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference among the mean doses to heart and spinal cord in three plans (P > 0.05). The data were shown in the table 1(table 1). Conclusions

Impact of different anatomical landmarks on registration in imaging-guided radiation for lung cancer

Cone-beam CT Imagine Registration of Lung Cancer

Evaluation of Positioning Accuracy of Four Different Immobilizations Using Cone-Beam Ct in Radiotherapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Image Registration and Target Volume Margins in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Lung tumor reproducibility with active breath control (ABC) in image-guided radiotherapy based on cone-beam computed tomography with two registration methods

The use of IGRT technique to measure the target position errors in SBRT treatment for lung cancer

[Scope and method of image registration and clinical target volume margin for central-type non-small cell lung cancer in image-guided radiotherapy].

The Accuracy of Image Registration Methods for Image-Guided Positioning in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Accuracy study of different registration methods for cone beam CT and planning CT in image-guided radiation therapy

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of on board imaging with cone beam CT using target registration in patients with lung tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy and comparison with ExacTrac using skeletal registration on Novalis Tx

Comparison of carina-based versus bony anatomy-based registration for setup verification in esophageal cancer radiotherapy

Experimental and Preliminary Clinical Study of Real-Time Registration in Liver Tumors During Respiratory Motion Based on a Multimodality Image Navigation System

Influence of different factors on registration error in a 1.5 T MR-guided linac

Impacts of Registration Parameters on Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Head and Neck Radiotherapy

[Impact of MRI-CT Image Registration on Target Delineation of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Gliomas].

SU-GG-I-99: Validation and Comparison of 3D Image Registration Approaches for Adaptive IMRT in Head-And-Neck Cancer

Analysis of the Setup Errors of Medical Image Registration-Based Cone-Beam Ct for Lung Cancer

Comparison of Geometrical Uncertainties in the Radiotherapy for Various Treatment Sites with Two Different Immobilization Marking Methods

Intra‐ and inter‐fractional variations of tumors with fiducial markers measured using respiratory‐correlated computed tomography images for respiratory gated lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

The Impact of Pet-Ct Image Coregistration on Radiation Treatment Planning for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer