Abstract:Purpose Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kVCBCT)‐guided adaptive radiation therapy (ART) uses daily deformed CT (dCT), which is generated automatically through deformable registration methods. These registration methods may perform poorly in reproducing volumes of the target organ, rectum, and bladder during treatment. We analyzed the registration errors between the daily kVCBCTs and corresponding dCTs for these organs using the default optical flow algorithm and two registration procedures. We validated the effectiveness of these registration methods in replicating the geometry for dose calculation on kVCBCT for ART. Methods We evaluated three deformable image registration (DIR) methods to assess their registration accuracy and dose calculation effeciency in mapping target and critical organs. The DIR methods include (1) default intensity‐based deformable registration, (2) hybrid deformable registration, and (3) a two‐step deformable registration process. Each technique was applied to a computerized imaging reference system (CIRS) phantom (Model 062 M) and to five patients who received volumetric modulated arc therapy to the prostate. Registration accuracy was assessed using the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and each method was compared with the intensity‐based registration method. The improvement in the dCT image quality of the CIRS phantom and five patients was assessed by comparing dCT with kVCBCT. Image quality quantitative metrics for the phantom included the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), uniformity, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), whereas those for the patients included the mean absolute error (MAE), mean error, peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). To determine dose metric differences, we used a dose‐volume histogram (DVH) and 3.0%/0.3 mm gamma analysis to compare planning computed tomography (pCT) and kVCBCT recalculations with restimulated CT images used as a reference. Results The dCT images generated by the hybrid (dCTH) and two‐step (dCTC) registration methods resulted in significant improvements compared to kVCBCT in the phantom model. Specifically, the SNR improved by 107% and 107.2%, the uniformity improved by 90% and 75%, and the CNR improved by 212.2% and 225.6 for dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the patient images, the MAEs improved by 98% and 94%, the PSNRs improved by 16.3% and 22.9%, and the SSIMs improved by 1% and 1% in the dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the geometric evaluation, only the two‐step registration method improved registration accuracy. The dCTH method yielded an average HD95 of 12 mm and average DSC of 0.73, whereas dCTC yielded an average HD95 of 2.9 mm and average DSC of 0.902. The DVH showed that the dCTC‐based dose calculations differed by 95% at all points, whereas they were <95% for kVCBCT‐based treatment plans. Conclusion The two‐step registration method outperforms the intensity‐based and hybrid registration methods. While the hybrid and two‐step‐based methods improved the image quality of kVCBCT in a linear accelerator, only the two‐step method improved the registration accuracy of the corresponding structures among the pCT and kVCBCT datasets. A two‐step registration process is recommended for applying kVCBCT to ART, which achieves better registration accuracy for local and global image structures. This method appears to be beneficial for radiotherapy dose calculation in patients with pelvic cancer.

Reproducibility Evaluation of the Manual Alignment Method for Kilovoltage Cone-beam CT Guided Radiotherapy

Study of different registration methods for on-line kilovoltage cone-beam CT guided lung cancer radiation

Online Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Ct Guided Lung Cancer Radiation: Initial Clinical Experiences From Shanghai

SU‐E‐T‐40: Exploring the Reproducibility of Tumor Volumes Measured by Radiologist, Computer‐Aided Radiologist and Computer Alone

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy

Accuracy study of different registration methods for cone beam CT and planning CT in image-guided radiation therapy

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of on board imaging with cone beam CT using target registration in patients with lung tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy and comparison with ExacTrac using skeletal registration on Novalis Tx

Analysis of the Setup Errors of Medical Image Registration-Based Cone-Beam Ct for Lung Cancer

Evaluation of rotational set-up errors in patients with thoracic neoplasms

Image Registration and Target Volume Margins in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

The use of IGRT technique to measure the target position errors in SBRT treatment for lung cancer

Analysis of clinical target volume positioning errors using cone beam computed tomography for patients with liver tumors with postoperative simplefied intensity-modulated radiotherapy

A Clinical Evaluation of Setup Errors in IMRT Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

Impact of different anatomical landmarks on registration in imaging-guided radiation for lung cancer

Evaluating the impact of possible interobserver variability in CBCT-based soft-tissue matching using TCP/NTCP models for prostate cancer radiotherapy

Positioning Accuracy And Efficacy Of Different Correction Protocols Based On Kv-Cone Beam Ct Guidance For Abdominal Pelvic Radiation Therapy

Role of Kilovoltage Cone-beam CT in Determining Individual Internal Target Volume for Lung Cancer Patients

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

Evaluation of the geometric and dosimetric accuracies of deformable image registration of targets and critical organs in prostate CBCT‐guided adaptive radiotherapy

Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation

Investigation of the feasibility of using kilovoltage cone-beam CT for accuracy dose calculation in esophageal cancer radiotherapy