Abstract:Purpose Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kVCBCT)‐guided adaptive radiation therapy (ART) uses daily deformed CT (dCT), which is generated automatically through deformable registration methods. These registration methods may perform poorly in reproducing volumes of the target organ, rectum, and bladder during treatment. We analyzed the registration errors between the daily kVCBCTs and corresponding dCTs for these organs using the default optical flow algorithm and two registration procedures. We validated the effectiveness of these registration methods in replicating the geometry for dose calculation on kVCBCT for ART. Methods We evaluated three deformable image registration (DIR) methods to assess their registration accuracy and dose calculation effeciency in mapping target and critical organs. The DIR methods include (1) default intensity‐based deformable registration, (2) hybrid deformable registration, and (3) a two‐step deformable registration process. Each technique was applied to a computerized imaging reference system (CIRS) phantom (Model 062 M) and to five patients who received volumetric modulated arc therapy to the prostate. Registration accuracy was assessed using the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and each method was compared with the intensity‐based registration method. The improvement in the dCT image quality of the CIRS phantom and five patients was assessed by comparing dCT with kVCBCT. Image quality quantitative metrics for the phantom included the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), uniformity, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), whereas those for the patients included the mean absolute error (MAE), mean error, peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). To determine dose metric differences, we used a dose‐volume histogram (DVH) and 3.0%/0.3 mm gamma analysis to compare planning computed tomography (pCT) and kVCBCT recalculations with restimulated CT images used as a reference. Results The dCT images generated by the hybrid (dCTH) and two‐step (dCTC) registration methods resulted in significant improvements compared to kVCBCT in the phantom model. Specifically, the SNR improved by 107% and 107.2%, the uniformity improved by 90% and 75%, and the CNR improved by 212.2% and 225.6 for dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the patient images, the MAEs improved by 98% and 94%, the PSNRs improved by 16.3% and 22.9%, and the SSIMs improved by 1% and 1% in the dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the geometric evaluation, only the two‐step registration method improved registration accuracy. The dCTH method yielded an average HD95 of 12 mm and average DSC of 0.73, whereas dCTC yielded an average HD95 of 2.9 mm and average DSC of 0.902. The DVH showed that the dCTC‐based dose calculations differed by 95% at all points, whereas they were <95% for kVCBCT‐based treatment plans. Conclusion The two‐step registration method outperforms the intensity‐based and hybrid registration methods. While the hybrid and two‐step‐based methods improved the image quality of kVCBCT in a linear accelerator, only the two‐step method improved the registration accuracy of the corresponding structures among the pCT and kVCBCT datasets. A two‐step registration process is recommended for applying kVCBCT to ART, which achieves better registration accuracy for local and global image structures. This method appears to be beneficial for radiotherapy dose calculation in patients with pelvic cancer.

[Impact of MRI-CT Image Registration on Target Delineation of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Gliomas].

Postoperative Radiotherapy For Glioma: Improved Delineation Of The Clinical Target Volume Using The Geodesic Distance Calculation

Comparison of Computed Tomography- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Target Delineation for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy

Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy.

Image Registration and Target Volume Margins in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Analysis of MRI-CT image registration accuracy by Tris-Axes Landmark

Application of MRI simulation in delineation of gross tumor volume in pre-operative radiotherapy for low rectal carcinoma

Influence of MRI-CT Fusion Image on Gross Tumor Volume Delineation and Dose Distribution for Radiation of Primary Tumors of Cervical Vertebra

Comparison of postoperative CT- and preoperative MRI-based breast tumor bed contours in prone position for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

Influence of different factors on registration error in a 1.5 T MR-guided linac

SU-GG-I-99: Validation and Comparison of 3D Image Registration Approaches for Adaptive IMRT in Head-And-Neck Cancer

Preliminary Research of MRI and CT Image Fusion Technology in Target Delineation and Treatment Plan Influence for Intracranial Tumors

Evaluation of the geometric and dosimetric accuracies of deformable image registration of targets and critical organs in prostate CBCT‐guided adaptive radiotherapy

Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast‐conserving surgery

Accuracy study of different registration methods for cone beam CT and planning CT in image-guided radiation therapy

Analysis of the Setup Errors of Medical Image Registration-Based Cone-Beam Ct for Lung Cancer

Rbio-01. Characterizing The Temporal Evolution Of Brain Architecture During Radiotherapy For Glioblastoma Using Nonlinear Image Registration

Role of Large-Diameter MRI Simulation in Target Volume Delineation in Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Influence Of Magnetic Resonance Simulation On Target Volume Delineation In Local Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Analysis of clinical target volume positioning errors using cone beam computed tomography for patients with liver tumors with postoperative simplefied intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Impact of different anatomical landmarks on registration in imaging-guided radiation for lung cancer