A Comparison Study Between Gross Tumor Volumes Defined by Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Postoperative Specimens, and Tumor Bed for Radiation Therapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery
A. Zhang,J. Li,W. Wang,Y. Wang,D. Mu,Z. Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.608
2016-01-01
Abstract:The aim of the study was to compare preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), postoperative pathology, excised specimen size, and tumor bed delineation as methods for determining the gross tumor volume (GTV) for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Fifty patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI and radiation therapy after BCS were enrolled. The GTVs determined by MRI, pathology, and the excised specimen were defined as GTVMRI, GTVPAT, and GTVES, respectively. GTVMRI+1 was defined as a 1.0-cm margin around the GTVMRI. The radiation oncologist delineated GTV of the tumor bed (GTVTB) using planning computed tomography according to surgical clips placed in the lumpectomy cavity. Potential factors such as the interval from surgery to radiation therapy, number of clips, locations of primary tumors that may affect the coincidence degree between GTVES and GTVTB were analyzed. The median GTVMRI, GTVMRI+1, GTVPAT, GTVES, and GTVTB were 0.97 cm3 (range, 0.01–6.88), 12.58 cm3 (range, 3.90–34.13), 0.97 cm3 (range, 0.01–6.36), 15.46 cm3 (range, 1.15–70.69), and 19.24 cm3 (range, 4.72–54.33), respectively. There were no significant differences between GTVMRI and GTVPAT, GTVMRI+1 and GTVES, GTVES and GTVTB (P = 0.188, 0.070, 0.264, respectively). Neither GTVES nor GTVTB correlated with GTVMRI (P = 0.071, 0.378, respectively). Furthermore, neither GTVES nor GTVTB correlated with GTVMRI+1 (P = 0.068, 0.375, respectively). In addition, the factors we analyzed had no impact on the coincidence degree between GTVES and GTVTB (P > 0.05). Although preoperative MRI was available for every BCS patient, neither GTVTB nor GTVES correlated significantly with preoperative GTVMRI if the boundary of the resected tumor was not pre-or intraoperatively marked by image guidance. When ≥5 surgical clips were used to demarcate the LC during BCS, the GTVTB was consistent with the GTVES. Therefore, a reasonably resected boundary of lumpectomy is a reliable indicator of GTVTB. These data suggest that surgeons should strictly refer to preoperative images when performing surgical resections. Improving the accuracy of GTVTB delineation can reduce the irradiated volume of normal breast tissue, achieving optimal oncologic and aesthetic outcomes.