Incidences of root cracks after root canal preparation: A comparison of two nickel-titanium instrumentation with different kinematics

Yan WANG,Jia GUO,Xi WANG,Wen-ting PAN,Wei-wei YU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15956/j.cnki.chin.j.conserv.dent.2015.09.010
2015-01-01
Abstract:AIM:To compare the incidences of tooth root cracks after root canal preparation using Twist File Adaptive( TFA) and ProTaper Universal system ( PTU) with adaptive motion and continuous rotation respectively. METHODS:100 mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 5 groups(n=20). The roots in control group were unprepared. And the other 80 teeth were divided into 4 experimental groups and the root canals were prepared by TFA and PTU to #25 with adaptive motion and continuous rotation respectively. All the roots were sectioned horizontally at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, and the slices were observed by stereomicroscope. The presence of root cracks was not-ed. RESULTS:No root crack was observed in the control group. The incidences of root cracks in PTU groups were significantly higher than those in TFA groups (P<0. 05). The incidence of root cracks was lower in TFA group work-ing with adaptive motion than that with continuous rotation (P<0. 05). There was no statistic difference of root crack incidence between adaptive motion and continuous rotation in PTU groups(P >0. 05). CONCLUSION: The new Twist File Adaptive instruments causes less crack than the traditional ProTaper Universal system. There is less crack using Twist File Adaptive with adaptive motion than that with continuous rotation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?