Via the popliteal venous catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis of acute lower extremity

Qing-yun ZHANG,Meng DING,Lei CHEN,Hong ZHANG,Zhi YANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16680/j.1671-3826.2017.09.14
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of popliteal venous catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT)in the treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis(DVT)in the lower extremity. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 39 cases of patients with a-cute DVT who were treated by CDT via popliteal venous from March 2012 to March 2017. All patients were treated by CDT via the popliteal venous after placement of vena caval filter. The success rate of catheter,the perimeter differences of the normal and affected lower limbs before and after treatment,the score of venous ventilation,the limb deep vein patency rate,deep vein valve retention rate, complications of interventional therapy and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome(PTS)were calculated to evaluate the efficacy. Results All patients had successful puncture catheter,and the success rate of catheter was 100. 0% . The perimeter differences of the normal and affected lower limbs before and after thrombolytic therapy was(6. 12 ± 1. 03)cm versus(2. 55 ± 0. 76)cm,respectively (P < 0. 05),and the swelling of the limbs were subsided significantly. The score of venous thrombus before and after the treatment was (5. 73 ± 0. 94)scores and (2. 13 ± 1. 60)scores,respectively(P < 0. 05);the ablation of thrombus was obvious,and the rate of ve-nous regeneration was(64. 23% ± 16. 21%). Among 39 cases,1 case had inflammation in the place of catheter tube,1 case had hema-tomas in the puncture site and 1 case had iliac vein stent implantation after thrombolysis when iliac vein stenosis was found,the com-plications of interventional therapy was 7. 7%(3 / 39). During the period of 6 to 12 months of follow-up,34 cases were accomplished, and the follow-up rate was 87. 2%(34 / 39). No DVT recurrence or pulmonary embolism(PE)occurred. The preservation rate of deep vein valve was(76. 14% ± 9. 15%),the incidence of PTS was 15. 4%(6 / 39). Conclusion The CDT via popliteal venous for acute DVT is safe and effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?