Catheter-directed Thrombolysis Compared with Anticoagulation Treatment for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis-Short and Mid-Term Result

ZHAO Haihua,CHEN Yuexin,WU Weiwei,YE Wei,LIU Changwei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2011.06.005

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To evaluate efficient and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT) for acute deep venous thrombosis(DVT).Methods:Between Jan 2009 and Oct 2010,20 acute DVT patients were treated via CDT in Peking Union Medical College Hospital.According to thrombosis position and time,we selected 20 additional patients who received anti-coagulation treatment to make a matched study.Lysis grade where calculated by using ultrasound before discharge,6 months and 12 months after first treatment.Major bleeding and other adverse events were also evaluated between two arms.Results:Patients' characters of both groups were similar,except age of anti-coagulation(AC) arm was significantly higher than CDT arm.75% patients had thrombosis in iliac vein,50% cases' DVT symptom were between 1 and 3 days.In the CDT group,urokinase was infused with pulse-spray methods with mean 3.43 million units,for a mean 79.2 hours.Two patients who had symptom for more than 10 days received 100 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator(r-tPA),due to poor response for urokinase.Lysis grades of the CDT group were significantly better than AC group within the three time points.Three major bleeding occurred in the CDT group,while the AC group had 1 case.Conclusion:For selected acute DVT patients,CDT could got good short and mid-term results.However,physicians should prepare efficient plan for bleeding events caused by CDT therapy.