Ultrasound-guided versus non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis
Cheng-yan ZHU,Wei-wei ZHANG,Jun-lan QIU,Zhi-ming JIANG,Yi SHEN,Wei WANG,Feng RAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7429.2017.03.009
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided versus non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods A total of 60 patients with DVT were analyzed retrospectively from August 2015 to April 2016 in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: ultrasound-guided CDT (Group A, 30 cases), and non-guided CDT (Group B, 30 cases). Success rate of puncture, length of operation, incidence rate of hematoma, pseudoaneurysms, and arteriovenous fistula at the puncture sites, circumferential diameter difference before and after thrombolysis, venous patency improvement rate, deep vein patency rates and occurrence rates of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in long term were evaluated in two groups. Results In group A: the average success rate of puncture was 1 time, average length of operation was (15.4±3.2) minutes, the incidence rate of hematoma at venipuncture sites was 3.33%. Neither pseudoaneurysm nor arteriovenous fistula occurred at the puncture sites. Circumferential diameter difference before and after thrombolysis was (49.47±2.484) mm, venous patency improvement rate of limb was (77.00±2.603)%. The long-term patency rate was 80.0% and the PTS occurrence rate was 10.0%. In group B, the average success rate of puncture was 5.9 times, average length of operation was (30.8±6.6) minutes, the incidence rate of hematoma at venipuncture sites of lower limb was 26.67%. Incidence of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula at the puncture sites was 6.67%. Circumferential diameter difference before and after thrombolysis was (28.40±2.856) mm, venous patency improvement rate of limb was (57.23±1.828)%. The long-term patency rate was 46.67% and the PTS occurrence rate was 36.67%. There were significant differences in success rate of puncture, length of opera-tion, incidence of arteriovenous fistula at the puncture sites, circumferential diameter change before and after thrombolysis, venous patency improvement rate, deep vein patency rates and occurrence rates of PTS in long term between two groups ( P<0 . 05 ) . Conclusion The therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided CDT is better than non-guided and it's worthy of clinical application.