Abstract:Objective: To examine the efficacy of antegrade and retrograde approaches with the AngioJet thrombectomy device for the treatment of acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and to evaluate the necessity of filter placement. Methods: The clinical data of patients with acute lower limb DVT treated with the AngioJet device from January 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the antegrade and retrograde treatment groups according to the surgical approach and the direction of valve opening. The thrombosis interception rate of the filter, incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), thrombectomy effectiveness, venous obstruction rate, and thrombosis recurrence rate of each treatment group were evaluated. In addition, factors affecting patency were analyzed. Results: AngioJet was employed for 84 patients with acute lower limb DVT, treating a total of 88 limbs. The thrombosis interception rate of the filter was 35.7% (30 patients). The incidence of new PE or PE exacerbation was 6.0% (5 patients), and a filter retrieval rate of 97.6% (82 patients) was detected. Thrombus removal of grade III occurred in 35 (64.8%) of the 54 limbs (61.4%) in the antegrade treatment group versus 13 (38.2%) of the 34 limbs (38.6%) in the retrograde treatment group (P < 0.05). At 3 months, venous patency and bleeding events involved 52 (96.3%) and 4 (7.4%) limbs in the antegrade treatment group, respectively, versus 29 (85.3%) and 2 (5.9%) in the retrograde treatment group, respectively (P > 0.05). Regression analysis was performed to determine factors that may affect 3-month patency in both groups. Statistically significant linear relationships were found between 3-month patency and thrombus removal rate [odds ratio [OR] = 0.546 (0.326, 0.916)], thrombus formation time [OR = 1.018 (1.002, 1.036)], and preoperative thrombosis score [OR = 1.012 (1.002, 1.022)] in the antegrade treatment group, as well as thrombus removal rate [0.473 (0.229, 0.977)] in the retrograde treatment group. In regression analysis of factors affecting patency in both groups and the venous clinical severity score/Villalta score, a statistically significant linear relationship was found between thrombus formation time and the venous clinical severity score in the antegrade treatment group [0.576 (0.467, 0.710)]. Conclusions: Both antegrade and retrograde approaches are safe and effective for the treatment of acute lower limb DVT. There are no differences in 3-month deep vein patency and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) incidence rates. Individuals with acute lower limb DVT are at high risk of thrombus shedding after treatment with AngioJet thrombectomy, and placement of a vena cava filter (VCF) is recommended for effective interception.

AngioJet Mechanical Thrombectomy for Lower Deep Venous Thrombosis

Preliminary Results of Application of Percutaneous AngioJet Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

Application of AngioJet in treatment of lower extremity arterial thromboembolic disease

A case-controlled study on AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches with a Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for the Treatment of Acute Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis

The effect of Angiojet rheolytic thrombectomy in the endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

Thrombectomy Combined with Endovascular Therapy in Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis of Lower Extremities

Observation of the effect of angiojet to treat acute lower extremity arterial embolization

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relative safety and efficacy of treating lower extremity deep vein thrombosis via pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis

Safety and Feasibility of Femoral Vein Thrombectomy for Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Lower Limbs

Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity of the Effect and Safety Analysis in 116 Cases

[Analysis of Clinical Therapeutic Effect Using Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis].

Clinical experience of thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

Syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy results in good safety and short-term outcomes in the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis

Thrombectomy monitoring by DSA combined with thrombolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities

Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy of thrombosed arteriovenous dialysis access using the AngioJet catheter- A Systematic Review

The Application of Assistant Catheterization Technique in Interventional Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis of Left Lower Extremity

Intra-arterial Contimuous Thrombolytic Therapy for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Application of inferior vena cava filter placement and catheter-guided thrombolysis in treatment of deep venous thrombosis in lower extremities

Intervention and surgical Therapy of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Effects of AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration system for patients of acute pulmonary embolism