MRI features of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and its detection value for multifocality compared with ultrasound

宋萌萌,汪登斌,王丽君,罗冉,李芳珍,崔雪娥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2015.11.004
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The purpose of this study was to investigate the MRI features of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC),and to compare its application value for the detection of multifocality of ILC with ultrasound.Methods:Nineteen pa-tients with ILC of breast histological confirmation underwent ultrasound and MRI examination were analysed retrospective-ly.The detection rate for multifocality of ILC between MRI and ultrasound was also compared.Results:The series included 19 cases.MRI found mass enhancement lesions in 15 cases,non-mass enhancement in 2 cases,and mixed enhancement in one case.One case was failed to detect on MRI,ultrasound and mammography.Among 15 mass enhanced cases,11 presented as a irregular mass with spiculated border.As for the 2 non-mass enhancement cases,one was a single lesion and the other was multifocal.The mixed enhancement mass showed as multifocal lesions.On the dynamic intensity curve (DIC)graphs,one case had early slow enhancement,3 medium enhancement,and the remaining 14 rapid enhancement in the initial phase.Mo-reover,8 cases appeared as persistent enhancement,4 showed as platform pattern and the other 6 presented as wash-out on the delayed phase.Eighteen cases underwent sonographic examination before or after MRI scan,of whom 17 cases were pos-itive.Twelve cases presented as irregular mass with hypoechoic and heterogeneous internal echoes.Of the positive 18 cases on MRI,4 were multifocal and 4 were multicentric,which were pathologically confirmed after surgery.While 4 cases were solitary,3 were multifocal and one was multicentric on ultrasound.The difference of detection rate was statistically signifi-cant between MRI and ultrasound (P =0.026 <0.05).One case with bilateral breast lesions was displayed only by MRI. Conclusion:Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast has some characteristics on MR imaging which has advantages compared with ultrasound for multifocality detection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?