Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Breast Lesions of Different Sizes: a Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Chunxiao Li,Minghua Yao,Sihui Shao,Xin Li,Gang Li,Rong Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190932
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), MRI, and the combined use of the two modalities for differentiating breast lesions of different sizes. Methods: A total of 406 patients with 406 solid breast masses detected by conventional ultrasound underwent both CEUS and MRI scans. Histological results were used as reference standards. The lesions were categorized into three groups according to size (Group 1, <= 20 mm; Group 2, > 20 mm, Group 3: total lesions). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to assess the diagnostic performance of these imaging methods for breast lesions. Results: There were 194 benign and 212 malignant breast lesions according to the histological diagnosis. Compared with MRI, CEUS demonstrated similar sensitivity in detecting breast cancer (p = 1.0000 for all) in all the three groups. With regard to specificity, accuracy, and the area under the ROC curve (Az) values, MRI showed a better performance than that shown by CEUS (p < 0.05 for all), and the combination of the two modalities improved the diagnostic performance of CEUS alone significantly (p < 0.05 for all) in all the three groups. However, the diagnostic specificity and accuracy of the combined method was not superior to that of MRI alone except for Group 2. Conclusion: CEUS demonstrated good sensitivity in detecting breast cancer, and the combined use with MRI can optimize the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in breast cancer prediction. Advances in knowledge: Few studies have compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and MRI, and this study is the first attempt to seek out the diagnostic values for breast lesions of variable sizes (lesions with <= 20mm and >20 mm).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?