Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Lesions: Comparison of Two Different Systems.
Wei-Wei Ren,Xiao-Long Li,Ya-Ping He,Dan-Dan Li,Dan Wang,Chong-Ke Zhao,Xiao-Wan Bo,Bo-Ji Liu,Wen-Wen Yue,Hui-Xiong Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ch-16243
2017-01-01
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of two different shear wave elastography (SWE) techniques in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from benign ones.MATERIALS AND METHODS:from March 2016 to May 2016, a total of 153 breast lesions (mean diameter, 16.8 mm +/- 10.5; range 4.1-90.0 mm) in 153 patients (mean age, 46.4 years +/- 15.1; age range 20-86 years) were separately performed by two different SWE techniques (i.e. T-SWE, Aplio500, Toshiba Medical System, Tochigi, Japan; and S-SWE, the Aixplorer US system, SuperSonic Imagine, Provence, France). The maximum (Emax), mean (Emean) and standard deviation (ESD) of elasticity modulus values in T-SWE and S-SWE were analyzed. All the lesions were confirmed by ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (n = 26), surgery (n = 122), or both (n = 5), with pathological results as the gold standard. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the diagnostic performance between T-SWE and S-SWE. Operator consistency was also evaluated.RESULTS:Among the 153 lesions, 41 (26.8%) were malignant and 112 (73.2%) were benign. Emax (T-SWE: 40.10 +/- 37.14 kPa vs. 118.78 +/- 34.41 kPa; S-SWE: 41.22 +/- 22.54 kPa vs. 134.77 +/- 60.51 kPa), Emean (T-SWE: 19.75 +/- 16.31 kPa vs. 52.93 +/- 25.75 kPa; S-SWE: 20.95 +/- 10.98 kPa vs. 55.95 +/- 22.42 kPa) and ESD (T-SWE: 9.00 +/- 8.55 kPa vs. 38.44 +/- 12.30 kPa; S-SWE: 8.17 +/- 6.14 kPa vs. 29.34 +/- 13.88 kPa) showed statistical differences in distinguishing malignant lesions from benign ones both in T-SWE and S-SWE (all p < 0.05). In T-SWE, the diagnostic performance of ESD was the highest (AUROC = 0.958), followed by Emax (AUROC = 0.909; p = 0.001 in comparison with ESD) and Emean (AUROC = 0.892; p < 0.001 in comparison with ESD), while in S-SWE, the diagnostic performance of Emax was the highest (AUROC = 0.967), followed by ESD (AUROC = 0.962, p > 0.05 in comparison with Emax) and Emean (AUROC = 0.930, p = 0.034 in comparison with Emax). AUROC-max (T-SWE: 0.909 vs. S-SWE:0.967), AUROC-mean (T-SWE: 0.892 vs. S-SWE: 0.930) and AUROC-SD (T-SWE: 0.958 vs. S-SWE: 0.962) showed no significant difference between T-SWE and S-SWE (all p > 0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of the intra-operator consistency and inter-operator consistency respectively were 0.961 and 0.898 in T-SWE, while 0.954 and 0.897 in S-SWE.CONCLUSION:T-SWE and S-SWE are equivalent for distinguishing the breast lesions. In T-SWE, E-SD had the best diagnostic performance, while in S-SWE, Emax had the best diagnostic performance.