Abstract:Objective To discuss the value of conventional ultrasound combined with virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions by breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) diagnostic criteria. Methods From January 2013 to October 2014, 395 breast lesions from 389 patients from the Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University were included in present study. All the lesions were confirmed by surgery pathology. Conventional ultrasound and VTI examinations were done before surgery. Both benign and malignant lesions were classified into varied categories based on the boundary of lesions under VTI mode. Benign and malignant breast lesions were classified into BI-RADS categories by conventional ultrasound or conventional ultrasound combined with VTI. The χ2 test was used to compare the differences of lesions′ boundaries between VTI categories and VTI mode. The pathology findings were used as golden criteria, to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasound as well as conventional ultrasound combined with VTI. And their diagnostic performances were compared by McNemar′s test. Results Of 395 breast lesions, 282 (71.4%) were benign, 113 (28.6%) were malignant. 75.5% (213/282) benign lesions were classified as Ⅱ-Ⅲ under VTI mode, while 83.2% (94/113) malignant lesions were classified as Ⅳ-Ⅴ under VTI mode. The differences in classification between them was statistically significant (χ2=114.759, P<0.01). 77.7% (219/282) benign lesions had unclear boundaries under VTI mode, while 78.8% (89/113) malignant lesions had clear boundaries under VTI mode. The differences in boundaries between them was statistically significant (χ2=108.480, P<0.01). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions were 97.3%, 54.2% and 66.6% respectively; while the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasound combined with virtual touch tissue imaging in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions were 98.2%, 84.4% and 88.4% respectively. The specificity and accuracy were higher when only using conventional ultrasound with statistical significance (χ2=79.425, 67.549, both P<0.01); however the sensitivity had no significantly different (χ2=11.974, P<0.01). Conclusion Conventional ultrasound combined with virtual touch tissue imaging can improve the specificity and the accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Key words: Elasticity imaging techniques; Ultrasonography; Breast diseases; Diagnosis, differential

Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Breast Lesions: Combined Utility of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Diagnostic Evaluations of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mammary Duct Ectasia and Breast Cancer

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Breast Lesions of Different Sizes: a Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced magnetic resonance for breast nodules

Conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

Comparison between combined ultrasounds and magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a cross-sectional study

The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Conventional Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Malignant Non-Mass Breast Lesions

The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RA DS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging

Comparison on Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

Evaluation of Breast Lesions by Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

Combination of acoustic radiation force impulse technology and three-dimensional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of breast lessions

Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Small Breast Lesions

Value of Ultrasound Elastography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Micro-Flow Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.

The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Conventional Ultrasound for Characterization of Indeterminate Soft-Tissue Tumors.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography by Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis in Breast Lesions A Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging