Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Combination of acoustic radiation force impulse technology and three-dimensional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of breast lessions

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

Acoustic radiation force impulse in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions

Study of acoustic radiation force impulse technology in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

Comparative Study of Conventional Ultrasound and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse(ARFI)in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign Nd Malignant Lesions/

Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography for Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions: A Meta-Analysis

Conventional US Combined with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Elastography for Prediction of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and the Risk of Lymphatic Metastasis

Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging technique in differential diagnosis of renal tumors

The value of ultrasound elastography combined with multi-parameters in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse for Differential Diagnosis of Benign or Malignant Breast Tumors

Combined Use of the Ultrasound Elastography and the Automated Breast Volume Scanner in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions

The usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse in differential diagnosis between benign and malignant thyroid nodules

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

Preliminary Results of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging by Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses for Evaluation of Breast Lesions.

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography in Differentiating Renal Solid Masses: a Preliminary Experience.

Combined Use of Shear Wave Elastography, Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique, and BI-RADS for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Risk stratification of thyroid nodules with Bethesda category III results on fine-needle aspiration cytology: The additional value of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.