Abstract:Background Pulse wave analysis using the SphygmoCor system allows the estimation of central blood pressures (BP). However, there is controversy over its accuracy for clinical use. Methods In 45 patients undergoing coronary angiography, we compared the ascending aorta BPs measured by the invasive catheter with the estimations by the SphygmoCor system, using paired t-tests, simple correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots. Results The estimation of central systolic BP by SphygmoCor was lower, although statistically insignificant, than that measured by the catheter (144 ± 29 vs. 148 ± 30 mm Hg; P = 0.98). The SD of the difference amounted to 17 mm Hg. Both measured and estimated central systolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the brachial systolic BP (156 ± 30 mm Hg). The diastolic BP measured at the brachial artery (87 ± 15 mm Hg) and provided by SphygmoCor (90 ± 15 mm Hg) were systematically higher (P < 0.001) than that measured by the catheter (74 ± 13 mm Hg). The SphygmoCor system underestimated the central pulse pressure by − 20 ± 14 mm Hg compared to the catheter method. The correlation coefficients for systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulse pressure between catheter measurements and the SphygmoCor estimations were 0.84, 0.60 and 0.82 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions When the radial waveform was calibrated with the oscillometric brachial pressures, the SphygmoCor system could not provide accurate estimation of central BPs. The inaccurate measurement of cuff pressure was the major limiting factor for the use of the transfer function in the clinical settings. Background Pulse wave analysis using the SphygmoCor system allows the estimation of central blood pressures (BP). However, there is controversy over its accuracy for clinical use. Methods In 45 patients undergoing coronary angiography, we compared the ascending aorta BPs measured by the invasive catheter with the estimations by the SphygmoCor system, using paired t-tests, simple correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots. Results The estimation of central systolic BP by SphygmoCor was lower, although statistically insignificant, than that measured by the catheter (144 ± 29 vs. 148 ± 30 mm Hg; P = 0.98). The SD of the difference amounted to 17 mm Hg. Both measured and estimated central systolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the brachial systolic BP (156 ± 30 mm Hg). The diastolic BP measured at the brachial artery (87 ± 15 mm Hg) and provided by SphygmoCor (90 ± 15 mm Hg) were systematically higher (P < 0.001) than that measured by the catheter (74 ± 13 mm Hg). The SphygmoCor system underestimated the central pulse pressure by − 20 ± 14 mm Hg compared to the catheter method. The correlation coefficients for systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulse pressure between catheter measurements and the SphygmoCor estimations were 0.84, 0.60 and 0.82 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions When the radial waveform was calibrated with the oscillometric brachial pressures, the SphygmoCor system could not provide accurate estimation of central BPs. The inaccurate measurement of cuff pressure was the major limiting factor for the use of the transfer function in the clinical settings.

Research on the Correction Method of Pulmonary Systolic Pressure Estimation by Echocardiography

E0664 Clinical Research on Influence Factors of Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure Derived from Tricuspid Regurgitation by Echocardigraph

The accuracy and influencing factors of Doppler echocardiography in estimating pulmonary artery systolic pressure: comparison with right heart catheterization: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity on Accuracy of Echocardiographic Estimation of Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Correlation of Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Other Cardiac Function Parameters

Accuracy and Precision of Three Echocardiographic Methods for Estimating Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Addressing the Controversy of Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Echocardiography

A new, simple, and accurate method for non-invasive estimation of pulmonary arterial pressure

Correlation between pulmonary arterial presure and right ventricular function by echocardiography in chronic ;thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Evaluation of the Hemodynamics and Right Ventricular Function in Pulmonary Hypertension by Echocardiography Compared with Right-Sided Heart Catheterization

Comparison of Pulmonary Artery Pressure Measurement With Doppler Echocardiography or With Right Heart Catheterization in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

An Alternative Echocardiographic Method to Estimate Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure: Diagnostic and Clinical Implications

Study On Noninvasive Auto-Estimation Of Pulmonary Arterial Pressures By Doppler Echocardiography Audio Signal Processing System

Reevaluation of Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure Calculated Through Tricuspid Regurgitation Pressure Gradient Method by Echocardiogram in Atrial Septal Defect

The Study on Nnoninvasive Auto-Estimation of Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Doppler Echocardiographic Audio-Signal Processing Technique in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study on the auto-estimation of pulmonary artery pressure,flow and resistance by audio-signal processing technique

P4368Estimation of pulmonary artery pressure from right atrial strain and tricuspid regurgitation velocity

Validation of the Central Blood Pressure Estimation by the SphygmoCor System in Chinese

Cardiovascular Parameters of Chest CT Scan in Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

Comparison of three Doppler ultrasound methods in the prediction of pulmonary artery pressure

Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure during exercise: the importance of right atrial hypertension