An Alternative Echocardiographic Method to Estimate Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure: Diagnostic and Clinical Implications

Javier F. Aduen,Ramon Castello,Marcelo M. Lozano,George N. Hepler,Cesar A. Keller,Francisco Alvarez,Robert E. Safford,Julia E. Crook,Michael G. Heckman,Charles D. Burger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2009.04.007
IF: 7.722
2009-07-01
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluated an alternative echocardiographic method to calculate mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP).METHODS: One hundred two patients were studied with simultaneous right-heart catheterization (RHC) and echocardiography. MPAP was calculated by adding the right ventricular-right atrial mean systolic gradient to right atrial pressure.RESULTS: The mean difference between MPAP calculated using this method and RHC-derived MPAP was -1.6 mm Hg, less than that of traditional systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP; -6.4 mm Hg) and MPAP estimated using the pulmonary regurgitation method (-13.9 mm Hg). The median absolute percentage difference of the MPAP calculations relative to RHC was significantly less with this method than with the pulmonary regurgitation method (18% vs 71%; P < .001) and similar to the SPAP method (both 18%; P = .30).CONCLUSION: MPAP calculated using the proposed method is as accurate as SPAP calculation and less variable than previous methods, thus allowing widespread clinical use.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?