Shamrock versus short-axis in-plane ultrasound guided methods in visualization of lumbar plexus block

Rui Lyu,Yan Chen,Jing Zeng,Chunyong Yang,Jian Cao,Bin Yi,Kaizhi Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16016/j.1000-5404.201602009
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy of ultrasound guided Shamrock and short-axis inplane methods in visualization of lumbar plexus block by comparing their accessibility,range and effect on ultrasonic imaging.Methods Thirty patients that underwent lumbar plexus block anesthesia for unilateral knee meniscus injury in our hospital from June to December 2015 were selected as study subjects.They were randomly and equally divided into 2 groups.The indexes,i.e.image positioning time,lumbar plexus depth,ultrasound visibility score (UVS) and ultrasonic imaging range,were recorded.Results All patients accomplished this study.There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in the sex,age and weight.The difference of lumbar plexus depth between the 2 groups was not significant either.The positioning time of Shamrock group was shorter than that of short-axis in-plane group (35.9 ± 20.1 vs 53.7 ± 21.2 s,P < 0.01).For both the UVS and imaging range,Shamrock group was significantly higher than short-axis in-plane group (P<0.01),with respective values of UVS (2.8 ±0.4 vs 2.1 ±0.8 points) and range (5.9 ±0.5 vs 3.5 ± 0.6).Conclusion Shamrock method is superior to short-axis in-plane method in ultrasonic visualization of lumbar plexus block.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?