Application of quadripolar LV lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy

王勇,陈康玉,严激,徐健,孙贤林,安春生,苏浩
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2015.11.027
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the application of quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).Methods Patients who met the indications for CRT were enrolled in this study,and received car-diac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D)device with quadripolar (quadripolar lead group)or bipolar (Bipolar lead group)left ventricular Lead.The short term clinical effect,synchronization,operation time and com-plications were then evaluated.Results There were no significant differences in coronary sinus calculation to final LV lead placement,operation time,fluoroscopy time and the location of LV lead between the two groups.Quadpi-polar lead group had significant and more usable configurations than bipolar lead group.Echo optimization showed that the aortic velocity time integral (AOVTI)and LV synchronization were significantly improved in quadripolar lead group one month after implantation.AOVTI (19.7 ±0.8 vs 18.9 ±1.1,P <0.05)and LV synchronization (78.9 ±16.0 vs 90.3 ±12.0 ms,P <0.05)were better in Quadripolar lead group than in bipolar lead group. There were significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction between the two groups six month after implan-tation (37.1 ±5.1% vs 32.9 ±5.5%,P <0.05).Conclusion The safety of quadripolar LV lead is the same as bipolar one.Quadripolar LV lead 's hemodynamics,LV synchronization and short term clinical effect are signifi-cantly better than Bipolar LV lead,and may help to reduce phrenic nerve stimulation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?