Abstract:Introduction Left ventricular (LV) lead position is strongly associated with the long-term outcome of patients undergoing de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation. However, data is scarce about patients who undergo upgrade CRT from right ventricular (RV) pacing. Aims To investigate the impact of the LV lead location on the primary outcome of heart failure (HF) hospitalization, all-cause mortality, or echocardiographic reverse remodelling in the BUDAPEST CRT Upgrade trial cohort. Methods Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with previously implanted pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and intermittent or permanent RV pacing, who were randomly assigned to the CRT-D arm (n=215) and those who were cross-overs from the ICD arm (n=27) were investigated. Short-axis position (anterior / posterior / lateral) of the LV lead was assessed. Primary endpoint encompassed HF hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and the end-systolic volume (ESV) decrease less than 15% from baseline to 12 months follow-up. Echocardiographic response was evaluated by percent change of ESV and LVEF. Results LV lead location was available for 223 patients (age 72.8 ± 8 years, 14% female, 38% diabetic, 49% with prior myocardial infarction, 30% with prior ICD) with a median follow-up time of 12.4 months. There was no difference in the occurrence of the primary endpoint by the lead positions (anterior vs. lateral OR 0.33; 95%CI 0.09-1.22, p=0.10, anterior vs. posterior OR 0.58; 95%CI 0.14-2.50, p=0.47). However, LVEF change was more pronounced in those with lateral LV lead location compared with anterior position (adjusted LVEF difference 7.43%, 95%CI 1.25 – 13.62; p=0.02), while those with posterior leads did not differ from the anterior ones (adjusted LVEF difference 3.00%, 95%CI -3.92 – 9.93; p=0.39). Decrease in ESV was also more remarkable with a lateral position as compared to the other locations (lateral vs. anterior adjusted ESV difference -0.17 mL, 95%CI -0.32 – (-0.01); p=0.03, posterior vs. anterior adjusted ESV difference -0.09 mL, 95%CI -0.26– 0.08; p=0.31). Conclusion Upgrade CRT results in better outcomes as compared to ICD alone; however, lateral LV lead position is associated with the most beneficial mid-term echocardiographic response as compared to other short-axis locations. This finding may translate into better clinical outcomes in the long term.

GW28-e1234 Impact of Different Left Ventricular Pacing Sites on Clinical Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

Effects of right ventricular lead location on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Relationship between left ventricular lead pacing position and long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Impact of left ventricular lead position on clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Pacing sites and modes in cardiac resynchronization therapy]

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Retrospective analysis of application of left ventricular active fixation lead in 26 cases

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes

Impact of Interlead Distance on Immediate and Mid-Term Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Determination of Optimal Left Ventricular Pacing Site for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Tissue Doppler Imaging

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Impact of left ventricular lead position on echocardiographic response after upgrading from right to biventricular pacing - Insights from the BUDAPEST CRT Upgrade Trial

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD PLACEMENT TARGETED AT THE LATEST ACTIVATED SITE GUIDED BY ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MAPPING IN CORONARY SINUS BRANCHES IMPROVES RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY

Impact of right ventricular lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy

Clinical evaluation of quadripolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy