Relationship between left ventricular lead pacing position and long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy
JIN Wei,WANG Fang,ZHANG Jian-jun,SUN Bao-gui,LIU Shao-wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2011.04.012
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of left ventricular(LV) lead pacing position on long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure(CHF).Methods One hundred and ten consecutive patients with CHF were implanted with a CRT device according to standard clinical indication.LV lead implantation position was categorized as anterior,lateral,posterior and postero-basic wall using both the postero-anterior and the left anterior oblique postoperative chest radiographs.All patients were followed for at least 12 months.After 12 months of CRT operation,the NYHA functional class,QRS width,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and other ultrasound indexes were analysed.Clinical response,defined by a ≥1 NYHA functional class reduction or LVEF increasing 25%.Results Due to cardiac vein anatomic variables and the examination of tissue doppler imaging(TDI),LV lead of 110 patients were individually into anterior(n=4),lateral(n=68),posterior(n=37)and posterior-base(n=1).During a follow-up of 12 months,6 patients died including 2 patients suffered from sudden death,1 patient categorized as serious pneumonia,3 patients attributed to heart failure worsening.After 12 months of CRT operation,the proportion of the 104 survivors responding to CRT is 87.5%,Clinic response was higher in patients with lateral(92.4%)versus posterior(87.5%)lead position(P<0.05).Conclusions CRT is an effective treatment for CHF in a long-term.The long-term outcome of CRT is associated with LV lead stimulation site.LV lateral or posterior wall is optimal for lead position.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?