Abstract:Objective: To explore the effects of combined catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) on hemodynamics and quality of life in a subgroup of patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis carel by using a case-control study. Methods: Eighty-four patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT: acute DVT and chronic DVT) of lower extremities treated in our hospital from April 2017 to June 2021 were randomly assigned into the control group (n = 42) and the research group (n = 42). The control group only received routine nursing combined with CDT; the research group was treated with cluster nursing l combined with CDT. The clinical efficacy, the difference in limb circumference, hemorheology, hemodynamics, coagulation index and life quality before and after treatment, and the nursing satisfaction scores were calculated. The effects of cluster nursing l combined with CDT on hemodynamics and life quality in patients with DVT of lower extremities were analyzed. Results: The clinical curative effect of the research group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the difference in the thigh and leg perimeter in the research group was reduced, and the difference in the thigh and leg perimeter in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the whole blood low shear viscosity, plasma viscosity, platelet aggregation rate, and fibrinogen in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, segmental venous volume (SVC), maximum venous blood flow (MVO), and SVC/MVO in the research group were significantly higher than those before intervention, VRT was significantly prolonged, and MVO and venous pressure recovery time (VRT) were significantly higher than those in the control group. After intervention, D-dimer and fibrinogen decreased, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time increased in the research group, and the improvement of blood coagulation index in the research group was significantly better than that in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of quality of life in the research group decreased, and the scores of physiological function, psychological function, social function, and health self-cognition in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of patients in the research group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of cluster nursing l combined with CDT can effectively prevent lower limb venous thrombosis after operation and can enhance patients' hemorheology, hemodynamics, and blood coagulation function and significantly promote their life quality, nursing satisfaction is high, and it is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.

Analysis of the Effect of Interventional Catheter Thrombolysis Combined with Anticoagulation in the Treatment of Postpartum Deep Venous Thrombosis

Perioperative Intervention to Prevent Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis after Gynecologic Surgery

Long-Term Outcome of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Pregnancy-Related Venous Thrombosis

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment on Pregnancy-Related Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Analysis of Efficacy of Therapy in 165 Cases of Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Extremity

Clinical observation of warfarin combined with low molecular weight heparin in treatment of postpartum venous thromboembolism

Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity of the Effect and Safety Analysis in 116 Cases

Clinic Effect Analysis of Compositive Therapy of 126 Cases of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Extremity

Comparison of clear effect and the complications, and short and mid-term effects between ultrasound-guided and non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity

Outcome Comparisons of Anticoagulation, Systematic Thrombolysis and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

Application evaluation of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis

Intra-arterial Contimuous Thrombolytic Therapy for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Effects of CDT on Hemodynamics and Quality of Life in a Subgroup of Patients with Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis Carel: A Case-Control Study

Efficacy and safety of postural intervention on prevention of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity in postpartum women with pregnancy-induced hypertension: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Catheter-directed Thrombolysis with Endovascular Angioptasty for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

Ultrasound-guided versus non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis

The Clinical Efficiency and Application Study of Comprehensive Interventional Treatment for Severe Pulmonary Embolism with Deep Vein Thrombosis

Catheter-directed Thrombolysis Compared with Anticoagulation Treatment for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis-Short and Mid-Term Result

Interventional and Surgical Therapy of Deep Vein Post-thrombosis Syndrom of Lower Extremity

[Analysis of Clinical Therapeutic Effect Using Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis].

Via the popliteal venous catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis of acute lower extremity