Abstract:This paper compares several approaches to model the unsteady and nonlinear longitudinal aerodynamics of a generic unmanned combat air vehicle configuration based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Three different reduced-order models (ROMs) are implemented through unsteady simulations to predict the evolution of forces and moments during prescribed trajectories carried out at [Formula: see text]. The first model investigates a linear quasi-steady model based on a first-order Taylor series expansion of the aerodynamic coefficients. The second one picks up the mathematical formulation of the first model but adds a dynamic coefficient in order to take into account the unsteady effect of rotation rate variations. Finally, the third model is built on indicial functions computed from positive step changes in the angle of attack or pitch rate. The unknown parameters of the first two models and the unknown indicial functions of the third one are obtained, respectively, from the study of forced oscillations and step motions. These prescribed trajectories are performed using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations coupled with a grid displacement tool. Two different methods are tested and compared to carry out the CFD mesh motions: an overset method and a full moving grid (FMG) method. The indicial functions obtained using the FMG method give results equivalent to those found in the literature in half the time of the overset method. To reduce the computational costs to set up the ROMs, the FMG method is preferred to the overset method. ROMs are then applied, and their predictions are compared with CFD simulations for prescribed trajectories with different angular rates and angles of attack. A study of instantaneous and overall accuracy associated with the implementation cost of the ROMs has allowed to show their strengths and their weaknesses. Similar results are observed at low angles of attack for the ROMs studied, while a major modeling advantage of the indicial method has been identified for higher angles of attack in the nonlinear domain.

Efficient prediction for time domain responses of forced oscillations and limit cycle oscillations

Reduced-Order Model Approaches for Predicting Airfoil Performance

Accuracy and Computational Cost Comparison of Numerical Flight Dynamics Reduced-Order Models

Efficient Transonic Aeroelastic Model Reduction Using Optimized Sparse Multi-Input Polynomial Functionals

A robust data-driven model for flapping aerodynamics under different hovering kinematics

Optimal Sparsity in Nonlinear Nonparametric Reduced Order Models for Transonic Aeroelastic Systems

Automated optimal experimental design strategy for reduced order modeling of aerodynamic flow fields

Optimal Sparsity in Nonlinear Non-Parametric Reduced Order Models for Transonic Aeroelastic Systems

A reduced-order model for compressible flows with buffeting condition using higher order dynamic mode decomposition with a mode selection criterion

A Combined Method of CFD Simulation and Modified Beddoes-Leishman Model to Predict the Dynamic Stall Characterizations of S809 Airfoil

Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling using Neuro-Fuzzy Approaches combined with POD

Evaluation of reduced-order models for the rapid aerodynamic analysis of supersonic and hypersonic bodies

Rapid prediction of unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of flapping wing based on GRU

Prediction of Separation Induced Transition on Thick Airfoil Using Nonlinear URANS Based Turbulence Model

Nonlinear parametric models of viscoelastic fluid flows

Data-driven reduced-order modeling for nonlinear aerodynamics using an autoencoder neural network

A novel unsteady aerodynamic Reduced-Order Modeling method for transonic aeroelastic optimization

Time-variant prediction of flow over an airfoil using deep neural network

Data-driven Balanced Truncation for Predictive Model Order Reduction of Aeroacoustic Response

Transonic Aerodynamic–Structural Coupling Characteristics Predicted by Nonlinear Data-Driven Modeling Approach

Reduced Order Data-Driven Analysis of Cavitating Flow over Hydrofoil with Machine Learning