Modeling of automated planning for esophageal cancer under complex dose prescription and anatomical sections

陈艳,王海洋,刘宏嘉,王美娇,韩建军,何君,贾冬,李莎,吴昊,蒲亦晨,张艺宝
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2020.12.007
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To study the feasibility and dosimetric characteristics of establishing a comprehensive model for automated treatment planning for esophageal cancer based on Varian RapidPlan module under complex conditions such as different prescriptions and anatomical sections.Methods:In total, 301 historical plans with multi-prescription and multi-sectional esophageal cancer were imported into RapidPlan system. Assisted by the ModelAnalytics(MA) tool, statistical verification was performed to profess outliers, yielding the initial model; Additional 40 clinical esophageal cancer treatment plans were duplicated as validation set. The RapidPlan-based re-optimization result was assessed and used as feedback data to fine-tune the model parameters iteratively. The primary dosimetric parameters of the two groups were then compared.Results:Through enlarged training set sample size and structure matching (based on relative dose rather than nomenclature), a comprehensive model feasible of handling various anatomic sections and dose prescriptions was successfully established. Both clinical plans and RapidPlan re-optimization were clinically acceptable, displaying complementary dosimetric advantages. Compared with the trial-and-error process of conventional manual planning, RapidPlan method was more efficient and independent from subjective influence, which induced inconsistency of plan quality.Conclusions:This work proposed and validated a modeling method of automated treatment planning for esophageal cancer under complex anatomic section and dose prescription. Dosimetric performance of the model is assessed based on independent validation set.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?