Different functional lung-sparing strategies and radiotherapy techniques for patients with esophageal cancer

Pi-Xiao Zhou,Rui-Hao Wang,Hui Yu,Ying Zhang,Guo-Qian Zhang,Shu-Xu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.898141
IF: 4.7
2022-08-27
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Background: Integration of 4D-CT ventilation function images into esophageal cancer radiation treatment planning aimed to assess dosimetric differences between different functional lung (FL) protection strategies and radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A total of 15 patients with esophageal cancer who had 4D-CT scans were included. Lung ventilation function images based on Jacobian values were obtained by deformation image registration and ventilation imaging algorithm. Several different plans were designed for each patient: clinical treatment planning (non-sparing planning), the same beam distribution to FL-sparing planning, three fixed-beams FL-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning (5F-IMRT, 7F-IMRT, 9F-IMRT), and two FL-sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning [1F-VMAT (1-Arc), 2F-VMAT (2-Arc)]. The dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared and focused on dosimetric differences in FL. Results: The FL-sparing planning compared with the non-sparing planning significantly decreased the FL-D mean , V 5-30 and Lungs-D mean , V 10-30 (V x : volume of receiving ≥X Gy), although it slightly compromised PTV conformability and increased Heart-V 40 (P< 0.05). The 5F-IMRT had the lowest PTV-conformability index (CI) but had a lower Lungs and Heart irradiation dose compared with those of the 7F-IMRT and 9F-IMRT (P< 0.05). The 2F-VMAT had higher PTV-homogeneity index (HI) and reduced irradiation dose to FL, Lungs, and Heart compared to those of the 1F-VMAT planning (P< 0.05). The 2F-VMAT had higher PTV conformability and homogeneity and decreased FL-D mean , V 5 - 20 and Lungs-D mean , V 5 - 10 but correspondingly increased spinal cord-D mean compared with those of the 5F-IMRT planning (P< 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, 4D-CT ventilation function image-based FL-sparing planning for esophageal cancer can effectively reduce the dose of the FL. The 2F-VMAT planning is better than the 5F-IMRT planning in reducing the dose of FL.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?