Geometrical Comparison and Quantitative Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT- and DW-MRI-Based Target Delineation Before and During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

Huimin Li,Jianbin Li,Fengxiang Li,Yingjie Zhang,Yankang Li,Yanluan Guo,Liang Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772428
IF: 4.7
2021-12-22
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Background and Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the geometrical differences in and metabolic parameters of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET-CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) performed before and during radiotherapy (RT) for patients with esophageal cancer based on the three-dimensional CT (3DCT) medium and explore whether the high signal area derived from DW-MRI can be used as a tool for an individualized definition of the volume in need of dose escalation for esophageal squamous cancer. Materials and Methods Thirty-two patients with esophageal squamous cancer sequentially underwent repeated 3DCT, 18 F-FDG PET-CT, and enhanced MRI before the initiation of RT and after the 15th fraction. All images were fused with 3DCT images through deformable registration. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated based on PET Edge on the first and second PET-CT images and defined as GTV PETpre and GTV PETdur , respectively. GTV DWIpre and GTV DWIdur were delineated on the first and second DWI and corresponding T 2 -weighted MRI (T 2 W-MRI)-fused images. The maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake values (SUVs; SUV max , SUV mean , and SUV peak , respectively); metabolic tumor volume (MTV); and total lesion glycolysis(TLG) and its relative changes were calculated automatically on PET. Similarly, the minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; ADC min and ADC mean ) and its relative changes were measured manually using ADC maps. Results The volume of GTV CT exhibited a significant positive correlation with that of GTV PET and GTV DWI (both p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in both ADCs and 18 F-FDG PET metabolic parameters before and during RT (both p < 0.001). No significant correlation was observed between SUVs and ADCs before and during RT ( p = 0.072–0.944) and between ∆ADCs and ∆SUVs ( p = 0.238–0.854). The conformity index and degree of inclusion of GTV PETpre to GTV DWIpre were significantly higher than those of GTV PETdur to GTV DWIdur (both p < 0.001). The maximum diameter shrinkage rate (∆LD DWI ) (24%) and the tumor volume shrinkage rate (VRR DWI ) (60%) based on DW-MRI during RT were significantly greater than the corresponding PET-based ∆LD PET (14%) and VRR PET (41%) rates ( p = 0.017 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusion Based on the medium of CT images, there are significant differences in spatial position, biometabolic characteristics, and the tumor shrinkage rate for GTVs derived from 18 F-FDG PET-CT and DW-MRI before and during RT for esophageal squamous cancer. Further studies are needed to determine if DW-MRI will be used as tool for an individualized definition of the volume in need of dose escalation.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?