Abstract:Purpose To develop and implement a fully automatic iterative planning (AIP) system in the clinical practice, generating volumetric‐modulated arc therapy plans combined with simultaneous integrated boost technique VMAT (SIB‐VMAT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. Method The designed AIP system aimed to automate the entire planning process through a web‐based service, including auxiliary structure generation, plan creation, field configuration, plan optimization, dose calculation, and plan assessment. The system was implemented based on the Eclipse scripting application programming interface and an efficient iterative optimization algorithm was proposed to reduce the required iterations in the optimization process. To verify the performance of the implemented AIP system, we retrospectively selected a total of 106 patients and performed dosimetric comparisons between the automatic plans (APs) and the manual plans (MPs), in terms of dose‐volume histogram (DVH) metrics, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) for different volumes of interest. Result The AIP system has successfully created 106 APs within clinically acceptable timeframes. The average planning time per case was 36.8 ± 6.5 min, with an average iteration number of 6.8 (±1.1) in plan optimization. Compared to MPs, APs exhibited better performance in the planning target volume conformity and hotspot control (p<0.001 ). The organs at risk (OARs) sparing was significantly improved in APs, with mean dose reductions in the femoral heads, the bone marrow, and the SmallBowel‐Avoid of 0.53 Gy, 1.18 Gy, and 1.00 Gy, respectively (p<0.001 ). Slight improvement was also observed in the urinary bladder V40Gy and the small bowel D2cc(p<0.001) . Additionally, quality variation between plans from different planners was observed in DVH metrics while the APs represented better plan quality consistency. Conclusion An AIP system has been implemented and integrated into the clinical treatment planning workflow. The AIP‐generated SIB‐VMAT plans for LARC have demonstrated superior plan quality and consistency compared with the manual counterparts. In the meantime, the planning time has been reduced by the AIP approach. Based on the reported results, the implemented AIP framework has been proven to improve plan quality and planning efficiency, liberating planners from the laborious parameter‐tuning in the optimization phase.

Quality and mechanical efficiency of automated knowledge‐based planning for volumetric‐modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer

Dosimetry and efficiency comparison of knowledge-based and manual planning using volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation

Clinical Acceptability of Automated Radiation Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer Using the Radiation Planning Assistant

Plan Quality Analysis of Automated Treatment Planning Workflow with Commercial Auto-Segmentation Tools and Clinical Knowledge-Based Planning Models for Prostate Cancer.

Automated evaluation for rapid implementation of knowledge-based radiotherapy planning models

Template-based automation of treatment planning in advanced radiotherapy: a comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation

Automatic Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Progressive Optimization in RayStation Treatment Planning System

Knowledge-based Semi-Automated Optimization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Plans Using a Volume Modulated Arc Therapy-Configured Model

A dosimetric evaluation of knowledge-based VMAT planning with simultaneous integrated boosting for rectal cancer patients.

A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans.

Radiotherapy Plan Quality Assurance in NRG Oncology Trials for Brain and Head/Neck Cancers: An AI-Enhanced Knowledge-Based Approach

Evaluation of Fully Automated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning of Cervical Cancer in RayStation Treatment Planning System

Evaluating automatically generated normal tissue contours for safe use in head and neck and cervical cancer treatment planning

The Model Training of Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Treatment Planning and Its Preliminary Application

Planning evaluation of a novel volume-based algorithm for personalized optimization of lung dose in VMAT for esophageal cancer

Replacing manual planning with automatic iterative planning for locally advanced rectal cancer VMAT treatment

Approach and assessment of automated stereotactic radiotherapy planning for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Single Click Automated Breast Planning with Iterative Optimization

MO‐A‐137‐05: Assessment and Prediction of Treatment Plan Quality Through Integrated Planning Script

A plan quality control method of treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery

Automatic Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Direct Three-Dimensional Patient Anatomy Match.