Direct synthesis of sodium alanate with novel catalytic TiB2
Li Li,Yijing Wang,Yaping Wang,Guang Liu,Yan Han,Fangyuan Qiu,Chao Yan,Dawei Song,Lifang Jiao,Huatang Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.064
IF: 6.2
2011-01-01
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Abstract:A novel catalyst TiB 2 is used in preparing TiB 2 -doped sodium aluminium hydride under a low hydrogen pressure. NaAlH 4 can be directly synthesized by using TiB 2 as catalyst in about 5 h at 2 MPa hydrogen pressure. It shows that TiB 2 has a remarkable catalytic effect and can enhance the performance of hydrogen release. The highest hydrogen desorption capacity of the sample doped with 8 mol% TiB 2 is 5.02 wt.%. Thus, TiB 2 particles synthesized is a promising catalyst for synthesizing and catalysing the hydrogen absorption and desorption in light-metal complex hydrides. Keywords Metal hydrides TiB 2 Hydrogen storage material Catalysis 1 Introduction Owing to the limited supply of fossil fuels, hydrogen has attracted massive attention as an alternative energy carrier [1–5] . A key technical challenge for hydrogen application is how to develop a viable on-board storage medium. In the past few decades, lots of efforts have been made to explore on-board hydrogen storage systems, such as compressed hydrogen gas, cryogenic and liquid hydrogen, metal hydrides [6–14] . However, all of them lack efficiency for commercial applications. Recently, light metal complex hydrides are the focus of research for vehicular hydrogen storage. Among various metal complex hydrides [15–20] , sodium aluminium hydride (NaAlH 4 ) is considered as one of the most suitable solid-state hydrogen storage materials since Bogdanović and Schwickardi [21] found that Ti-catalyzed NaAlH 4 exhibited reversible hydrogen storage together with enhanced kinetics. Recently, great attention has been paid to prepare NaAlH 4 by milling NaH/Al with catalysts under hydrogen atmosphere, because this method could effectively reduce the cost and improve the hydrogen absorption and desorption of NaAlH 4 . J.M. Bellosta von Colbe synthesized NaAlH 4 by milling NaH/Al with TiCl 3 under hydrogen atmosphere with an initial pressure of 83 bar [22] . Later, Bitter [23] reported the synergistic effect on dehydrogenation kinetics of NaAlH 4 with doping Ti-catalyst. They discovered that the kinetics of NaAlH 4 had been improved greatly with doping 2 mol% Ti-catalyst. Moreover, Xiao et al. [24] reported that it was possible to achieve direct synthesis of NaAlH 4 by milling NaH/Al with TiF 3 catalyst for 50 h at 25 bar hydrogen pressure during the in situ hydrogenation process. However, there are many problems about the synthesis of NaAlH 4 by milling the NaH/Al mixture: long time of milling, high hydrogen pressure and byproduct. Therefore, it is necessary to explore a novel catalyst on the direct synthesis of NaAlH 4 from NaH and Al. In this paper, NaAlH 4 was synthesized by dry ball milling NaH/Al with novel TiB 2 catalyst under 1–2 MPa hydrogen pressure at ambient temperature. The hydrogen desorption performance of NaAlH 4 was also tested. 2 Experimental 2.1 Synthesis of NaAlH 4 The mixture of NaH(97%, Alfa Aesar)/Al(99.5%, Alfa Aesar) and 8 mol% TiB 2 (synthesized by solid state reaction) was introduced into a stainless steel vessel with stainless steel balls and milled in a planetary ball mill. The ball-to-powder weight ratio was 40:1, the mixture was milled (450 rpm) under Ar atmosphere for 15 h, and then milled (450 rpm) under 1–2 MPa hydrogen pressure for 0–40 h at ambient temperature. The different milling conditions of the samples are listed in Table 1 . All the operations were carried out in the glove box (Super 1220/750/900) under purified argon atmosphere (H 2 O: <10 ppm; O 2 : <10 ppm). 2.2 Characterization Phase compositions of the samples were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max PC2500, Cu Kα radiation) and refined by GSAS program [25] . The dehydrogenation rates of the samples were measured at atmospheric pressure in flowing argon (about 35.3 ml/min) in a temperature programmed desorption (TPD, PX200) mode at a ramping rate of 2 °C/min. The weight loss percentage of the samples was calculated according to the weight of NaAlH 4 in the reactor. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Effect of milling time Fig. 1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of as-prepared samples. Detailed preparation conditions for those samples are given in Table 1 . As shown in Fig. 1 a, the diffraction peaks of NaH and Al are broad and weak, and some peaks of Na 3 AlH 6 appear in sample S1-5. In sample S1-10, Na 3 AlH 6 becomes the main phase. When the milling time increases to 20 h (S1-20) and 30 h (S1-30), the peak intensity of Na 3 AlH 6 gradually decreases and NaAlH 4 peaks become sharp. As the milling time increases to 40 h (S1-40), Na 3 AlH 6 diffraction peaks completely disappear, suggesting that Na 3 AlH 6 is completely hydrogenated to form NaAlH 4 . In addition, when the hydrogen pressure is 2 MPa ( Fig. 1 b) without ball-milling (S2-0), no new phase appears. And when the ball-milling time is 5 h (S2-5), the diffraction peaks of NaH almost disappear and some peaks of NaAlH 4 and Na 3 AlH 6 can be detected. This demonstrates that the hydrogenation reaction NaAlH 4 occurs in a relatively short ball milling time. The conversion of NaAlH 4 can be completed under the synthesis condition of sample S2-15, exhibiting a high kinetic of hydrogenation. GSAS refinement is used to analyse the phase composition of the S2-15 sample. The calculated curve agrees well with the observed XRD pattern as shown in Fig. 2 . It can be seen that NaAlH 4 , Al and TiB 2 phases are existed in the S2-15 sample. The GSAS refinement results shown in Table 2 show that the contents of the NaAlH 4 , Al and TiB 2 phases are 57.53 wt.%, 23.90 wt.% and 18.57 wt.%, respectively. 3.2 Effect of hydrogen pressure As shown in Fig. 1 a, when the hydrogen pressure is 1MPa, the peaks of NaH and Al become broad and weak, and some peaks of Na 3 AlH 6 appear in sample S1-5. And Na 3 AlH 6 is the main phase in sample S1-10. When the hydrogen pressure increases to 2 MPa ( Fig. 1 b), the diffraction peaks of NaH in sampe S2-5 almost disappear and some peaks of NaAlH 4 and Na 3 AlH 6 can be detected. And the diffraction peaks of Na 3 AlH 6 almost disappear and NaAlH 4 is the dominant phase in sample S2-10. Therefore, a higher hydrogen pressure is helpful for the conversion of Na 3 AlH 6 to NaAlH 4 . Moreover, variation of the relative abundance of the NaAlH 4 , Na 3 AlH 6 , Al, TiB 2 of S1-10, S1-20, S1-30 and S1-40 samples from GSAS refinement results are shown in Fig. 3 . It can be seen that the content of NaAlH 4 phase in sample S1-20 is about 11.20 wt.%, which increases to 31.26 wt.% in sample S1-30 and 57.27 wt.% in sample S1-40. It can be concluded that the amount of NaAlH 4 increases with the milling time. In addition, the weight percentage of Na 3 AlH 6 phase decreases gradually (27.44 wt.% in S1-10, 20.55 wt.% in S1-20, 12.39 wt.% in S1-30) and finally vanishes in S1-40 sample. 3.3 Thermal decomposition characteristics Fig. 4 displays the hydrogen desorption of the S2-5, S2-15 and S1-40 samples. All the TPD curves exhibite two characteristic plateau regions. It is suggested that there are two weight loss steps which are attributed to the dehydrogenation of the synthesized NaAlH 4 and Na 3 AlH 6 , respectively. The TPD curve of the S2-5 system exhibites two weight-loss steps of 0.878% and 1.93 wt.%. And the two weight-loss steps of S2-15 sample obviously increase to 3.01% and 1.94 wt.%. It can be also seen obviously from Fig. 4 that the content of the NaAlH 4 phase increases with the milling time. In addition, the two weight-loss steps of S1-40 sample reach to about 3.12% and 1.90 wt.%. And the total dehydrogenation capacities observed are about 5.02 wt.%. These results show that TiB 2 plays an essential role in the synthesis and decomposition of NaAlH 4 . 4 Conclusions NaAlH 4 nanocrystalline is successfully obtained with TiB 2 catalyst via ball milling the mixture of commercial NaH and Al powder under hydrogen. With the increase of hydrogen pressure and milling time, the synthetic efficiency of NaAlH 4 increases significantly. And the highest dehydrogenation capacity observed is about 5.02 wt.%. It demonstrates that TiB 2 is a promising catalyst for enhancing hydrogen release in light-metal complex hydrides. Further investigations about the function of TiB 2 in the systhesis of sodium alanate hydride are on the way. Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by MOST projects ( 2007AA05Z149, 2007AA05Z108, 2010CB631303 ), NSFC ( 50631020, 50701025, 50971071 ) and MOE ( IRT-0927 ). References [1] L. Schlapbach A. Züttel Nature 414 2001 353 358 [2] W. Grochala P.P. Edwards Chem. Rev. 104 2004 1283 1315 [3] P. Chen Z.T. Xiong W.Z. Luo K. Lin K.L. Tan Nature 420 2002 302 304 [4] K. Yvon B. Bertheville J. Alloys Compd. 425 2006 101 108 [5] D. Chandra J.J. Reilly R. Chellappa JOM 58 2006 26 32 [6] H.W. Brinks C.M. Jensen S.S. Srinivasan B.C. Hauback D. Blanchard K. Murphy J. Alloys Compd. 376 2004 215 221 [7] V. Ozolins E.H. Majzoub T.J. Udovic J. Alloys Compd. 375 2004 1 10 [8] S. Satyapal J. Petrovic C. Read G. Thomas G. Ordaz Catal. Today 120 2007 246 256 [9] L.C.J. Rowsell O.M. Yaghi J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 2006 1304 1315 [10] T. Ichikawa S. Isobe N. Hanada H. Fujii J. Alloys Compd. 365 2004 271 276 [11] K.A. Lokshin Y.S. Zhao Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 2006 131909 131911 [12] F. Fang S.Y. Zheng G.R. Chen G. Sang B. He S.Q. Wei D.L. Sun Acta Mater. 57 2009 1959 1965 [13] F.H. Wang Y.F. Liu M.X. Gao K. Luo H.G. Pan Q.D. Wang J. Phys. Chem. C 113 2009 7978 7984 [14] S.Y. Zheng F. Fang J. Zhang L.X. Sun B. He S.Q. Wei G.R. Chen D.L. Sun J. Phys. Chem. C 111 2007 14021 14025 [15] A. Züttle P. Wenger S. Rentsch P. Sudan Ph. Mauron C. Emmenegger J. Power Sources 118 2003 1 7 [16] S.C. Amendola S.L. Sharp-Goldman M.S. Janjua N.C. Spencer M.T. Kelly P.J. Petillo M. Binder Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 25 2000 969 975 [17] I.E. Malka T. Czujko J. Bystrzycki Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 1706 1712 [18] P. Wang X.D. Kang H.M. Cheng Chem. Phys. Chem. 6 2005 2488 2491 [19] J.F. Mao Z. Wu T.J. Chen B.C. Weng N.X. Xu T.S. Huang Z.P. Guo H.K. Liu D.M. Grant G.S. Walker X.B. Yu J. Phys. Chem. C 111 2007 12495 12498 [20] X.D. Kang Z.Z. Fang L.Y. Kong H.M. Cheng X.D. Yao G.Q. Lu P. Wang Adv. Mater. 20 2008 2756 2759 [21] B. Bogdanović M. Schwickardi J. Alloys Compd. 253 1997 1 9 [22] J.M. Bellosta von Colbe M. Felderhoff B. Bogdanović F. Schüth C. Weidenthaler Chem. Commun. 37 2005 4732 4734 [23] C.P. Baldé B.P.C. Hereijgers J.H. Bitter K.P.D. Jong J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 2008 6761 6765 [24] X.Z. Xiao L.X. Chen X.L. Fan X.H. Wang C.P. Chen Y.Q. Lei Q.D. Wang Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 2009 041907 041909 [25] B.H. Toby J. Appl. Cryst. 34 2001 210 213