MODIFICATION MECHANISM OF AMPHOTERIC MODIFIER BS-12 ON TWO DIFFERENT CLAYS

Wenbin Li,Zhaofu Meng,Qiong Wu,Dan Bai,Shaoe Xu,Yu Lu
2016-01-01
Fresenius environmental bulletin
Abstract:To explore the modification mechanism of BS-12 (dodecyl dimethyl betaine) on different clay, this study chose bentonite and kaolin as the subjects. The modification mechanism was determined via the changes in the S-BC (sum of BS-12 and Ca2+/2 adsorbed on clay) curves. This mechanism was verified through the Vanselow ionic selectivity coefficients, adsorption isotherms and superficial characteristics such as TOC (total organic carbon) content, XRD (x ray diffraction) and SBET (specific surface area). Results indicated that: 1) Ion exchange and hydrophobic bonds coexisted in the process of bentonite and kaolin modification with BS-12, and the hydrophobic modification began to appear at BS-12 modification ratios of 40.09% and 29.11% CEC (cation exchange capacity) of bentonite and kaolin, respectively. After 85.30% and 78.44% CEC of bentonite and kaolin, respectively, hydrophobic modification was stronger than ion exchange and became the main modification mechanism. 1) LnK(v) [(the natural logarithm for K-v (Vanselow selectivity coefficients)] of two clays were all greater than 1, indicating that the adsorption preferences for BS-12 were greater than Ca2+, meanwhile the LnKv values increased significantly with the increase in BS-12 modification ratios. 3) Adsorption isotherms increased sharply before an inflection point occurred at the modification ratio of 60% (bentonite) and 40% (kaolin) CEC of clay, then the ascensional range decreased after this modification ratio. Lastly, both rapidly rose again after the modification ratio of 100% CEC of the two clays. 4) TOC content, door of two clays and S-BET of bentonite all showed no significant distinction between bentonite and 25%BS bentonite, S-BET had significant differences between kaolin and 15%BS kaolin. On the other hand, characteristics of 50% and 100%BS bentonite, 30% and 60%BS kaolin all significantly increased (for TOC and d(001)) or reduced (for S-BET) compare with that of 25%BS bentonite and 15%BS kaolin, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?