Abstract:Background: The key to reducing the immense morbidity and mortality burdens of cardiovascular diseases is to help people keep their blood pressure (BP) at safe levels. This requires that more people with hypertension be identified, diagnosed, and given tools to lower their BP. BP monitors are critical to hypertension diagnosis and management. However, there are characteristics of conventional BP monitors (oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers) that hinder rapid and effective hypertension diagnosis and management. Calibration-free, software-only BP monitors that operate on ubiquitous mobile devices can enable on-demand BP monitoring, overcoming the hardware barriers of conventional BP monitors. Objective: This study aims to investigate the accuracy of a contactless BP monitor software app for classifying the full range of clinically relevant BPs as hypertensive or nonhypertensive and to evaluate its accuracy for measuring the pulse rate (PR) and BP of people with BPs relevant to stage-1 hypertension. Methods: The software app, known commercially as Lifelight, was investigated following the data collection and data analysis methodology outlined in International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 "Non-invasive Sphygmomanometers-Part 2: Clinical investigation of automated measurement type." This validation study was conducted by the independent laboratory Element Materials Technology Boulder (formerly Clinimark). The study generated data from 85 people aged 18-85 years with a wide-ranging distribution of BPs specified in ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020. At least 20% were required to have Fitzpatrick scale skin tones of 5 or 6 (ie, dark skin tones). The accuracy of the app's BP measurements was assessed by comparing its BP measurements with measurements made by dual-observer manual auscultation using the same-arm sequential method specified in ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020. The accuracy of the app's PR measurements was assessed by comparing its measurements with concurrent electroencephalography-derived heart rate values. Results: The app measured PR with an accuracy root-mean-square of 1.3 beats per minute and mean absolute error of 1.1 (SD 0.8) beats per minute. The sensitivity and specificity with which it determined that BPs exceeded the in-clinic systolic threshold for hypertension diagnosis were 70.1% and 71.7%, respectively. These rates are consistent with those reported for conventional BP monitors in a literature review by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The app's mean error for measuring BP in the range of normotension and stage-1 hypertension (ie, 65/85, 76% of participants) was 6.5 (SD 12.9) mm Hg for systolic BP and 0.4 (SD 10.6) mm Hg for diastolic BP. Mean absolute error was 11.3 (SD 10.0) mm Hg and 8.6 (SD 6.8) mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions: A calibration-free, software-only medical device was independently tested against ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020. The safety and performance demonstrated in this study suggest that this technique could be a potential solution for rapid and scalable screening and management of hypertension.

Validation of the Bpump Bf1112 Upper-Arm Blood Pressure Monitor for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010

Validation of the DBP-1333b upper-arm blood pressure monitor according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020)

Validation of the RBP‐9801 oscillometric blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/ International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard

Validation of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol

Validation of the validity of the new wrist-type fully automatic blood pressure monitor: DBP-2242 according to ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD 1:2020

Validation of Omron HBP-1300 professional blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in children and adults

O31 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT OF A CUFF-BASED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICE ACCORDING TO ARTERY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS

Validation of two automatic sphygmomanometers according to the modified International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018 protocol in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference of 22 centimeters or less

Validation of TMB-2285-BT wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020 Protocol

Validation of a wearable cuff-less wristwatch-type blood pressure monitoring device

Validation of the Raycome model M2 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018)

P077 IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATED BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICES DESIGNED FOR HOME OR IN-CLINIC USE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF VALIDATION STUDIES

Validation of combiomed hipermax-BF model A7101 automatic oscillometric upper-arm sphygmomanometer in general population: AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd 1:2020)

P074 STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBLISHED VALIDATION STUDIES OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES

O20 CURRENT 24-HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE TECHNOLOGIES SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED AS THE REFERENCE STANDARD FOR VALIDATION OF CUFFLESS BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICES

Validation of the Mindray VS9 Vital Signs Monitor in a combined adult and pediatric population according to ISO Standard 81060-2:2018

Blood Pressure Measurements Obtained by Community-Dwelling Adults Are Similar to Nurse-Obtained Measurements: The SMART-BP Validate Study

Validation of the watch-type HUAWEI WATCH D oscillometric wrist blood pressure monitor in adult Chinese

Validation and Acceptability of a Cuffless Wrist-Worn Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Device Among Users and Health Care Professionals: Mixed Methods Study

EVALUATION OF A PROTOTYPE CUFFLESS MULTI-SENSOR DEVICE TO TRACK BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES

Contactless and Calibration-Free Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate Monitor for Screening and Monitoring of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Validation Study