Clinical Outcomes of Endobutton Versus Traditional Screw Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis in Ankle Fractures

马腾,王谦,路遥,李明,孙亮,薛汉中,李忠,张堃
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2016.08.002
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes for endobutton versus traditional screw fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures.Methods Sixty-nine cases of ankle fractures accompanied with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury hospitalized between November 2012 and November 2014 were reviewed retrospectively.Thirty-two cases (19 males and 13 females) aged (38.1 ± 15.3) years (range,22-62 years) underwent syndesmosis stabilization with endobutton system (endobutton group),and mechanism of injury was sprain injury in 20 cases,traffic injury in 7 and high fall injury in 5.Another 37 cases (20 males and 17 females) aged (33.9 ± 11.1) years (range,22-65 years) were managed with traditional screw fixation (tradition group),and mechanism of injury was sprain injury in 22 cases,traffic injury in 8 and high fall injury in 7.According to the Lauge-Hansen classification,all had pronation external rotation ankle fractures.Operation time,manipulation angle,tibiofibular clear space (TBCS),tibiofibular overlap distance (TBOL),complications and final follow-up evaluation of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score were recorded.Results Comparison of endobutton group to tradition group showed no significant differences in operation time [10 min (5-17 min) ∶9 min(4-15 min)],TBOL [(9.1 ± 1.8)mm∶ (8.2 ±2.3)mm],TBCS [(3.7 ±0.6)mm:(3.6 ± 0.9) mm],total complication rate [6.3 %:13.5 %] and AOFAS score [(89.1 ± 18.5) points:(86.6 ± 12.4) points] (P > 0.05),but endobutton technique was associated with a larger manipulation angle [(45.8 ± 16.7) °:(28.5 ± 5.6) °] and earlier full weight bearing [(6.8 ± 1.6) weeks:(10.9 ± 2.7) weeks] than traditional screw fixation (P < 0.05).Conclusion Endobutton technique has comparative effect with traditional screw fixation and has advantages such as low demand in fixation angle,early weight bearing and no need for removal of implant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?