Distal tibiofibular hook and suture-button technique for treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury:a comparative study

芦浩,徐海林,姜保国,付中国,张殿英,王天兵,张培训,薛峰,陈建海
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2015.02.006
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury repaired with distal tibiofibular hook and suture-button technique.Methods From January 2005 to September 2013,34 cases of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury combined with ankle fracture were repaired with distal tibiofibular hook (n =20) or Suture-button (n =14).In distal tibiofibular hook group,there were 14 males and 6 females aged 21-69 years (mean,34.4 years).Fracture was classified as 5 type B and 15 type C using Danis-Weber system,and 3 supination-external rotation type,5 pronation-abduction type,and 12 pronation-external rotation type using Lauge-Hansen classification.In suture-button group,there were 8 men and 6 women aged 24-44 years (mean,28.7 years).Fracture was classified as 3 type B and 11 type C using Danis-Weber system,and 3 supination-external rotation type,3 pronation-abduction type,and 8 pronation-external rotation type using Lauge-Hansen classification.American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used for evaluation of bone union and syndesmosis reduction.Results Thirtyone patients were followed up for 11-114 months (mean,63.5 months).Mean AOFAS was 88.3 points (range,84-100 points) in tibiofibular hook group,and was 90.5 points (range,85-100 points) in suture-button group (P > 0.05).All fractures were united without recurrent syndesmosis diastasis.In tibiofibular hook group,the hook was removed 12 weeks after the primary operation and other instruments were removed (12.4 ± 1.4) months (range,11-15 months) after the primary operation.In suture-button group,3 cases had removal of all instruments within 12 months postoperatively.Conclusion Distal tibiofibular hook or suture-button is an effective way to repair the syndesmosis,but suture-button has the advantages of operative approaeh selection and implant removal.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?