Reduction of bone marrow dose by intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy

Hui-ling LI,Jian-ji PAN,Peng-gang BAI,Bin ZHANG,Cedric YU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2009.03.221
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare whole pelvic conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) techniques in reducing the volume and dose of bone marrow of patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy. Methods Seventeen patients with stage ⅠA-ⅡB cervical cancer after hysterectomy were selected. Clinical tumor volume(CTV) included parametria, presacral space, upper vagi-na,pelvic and common iliac lymph nodes. Planning tumor volume(PTV) was 1 cm extention of the CTV. The Pinnacle planning system version 7.4f was used to develop conventional and Seven-field IMRT plans,re-spectively. Conventional treatment planning included AP/PA fields(CRT2f) and four-field(CRT4f). The pre-scribed dose was 45.0 Gy and 50.4 Gy, respectively. All plans were optimized to assure that more than 97% of PIN volume received 95% of prescribed dose. The dose volume histograms were used to compare V20, V25, V30 and V40 of the bone marrow among different plans. Results On 45.0 Gy prescription, the V25, V<,30>or V40 of the right and left ilium bone marrow were 45.04% and 40.90%, 64.37% and 65.25%, 60.20% and 61.42% (H=7.45,P=0.024 and H=6.62,P=0.038) in IMRT7f, with 36.91% and 22.21%, 52.69% and 48.80%, 40.52% and 42.33% (H=7.91,P=0.019 and H=10.5,P=0.005) in CRT2f, 23.83% and 19.65%,51.85% and46.11%,37.97% and 35. 30% (H=17.14, P=0.000 and H=20.71,P=0.000)in CRT4f;on 50.4 Gy prescription,with 52.43% and 50.06%, 65.89% and 67.75%, 69.56% and 64.23% (H=6.29,P=0.043 and H=6.37,P=0.041) in IMRT7f,38.91% and 31.93%, 54.96% and 51.29% ,52.18% and 47.57% (H=6.91, P=0.031 and H=15.19,P=0.000) in CRT2f,25.93% and 20.87%, 53.30% and 49.83%, 44.26% and 37.77% (H=16.71, P=0.000 and H=20.78, P=0.000) in CRT4f. Conclusions Compared with CRT, IMRT can guarantee better target dose distribution, less irradiation volume and lower dose of bone marrow in cervical cancer after hysterectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?