Compare of integral radiation dose of conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy, for endometrial carcinoma after operation

YANG Rui-jie,XU Shou-ping,JIANG Wei-juan,ZHOU Gui-xia,XIE Chuan-bin,WANG Jun-jie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2009.20.024
2009-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the integral dose (ID) to normal structures of three dimensional conformal (3D-CRT), step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (SaS-IMRT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) for endometrial cancer patients undergoing postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy. METHODS: Whole pelvic 3D-CRT, SaS-IMRT and HT plans were created for ten postoperative endometrial cancer patients. The ID to normal structures was compared for three groups of plans. RESULTS: The mean conformity index was 0.61, 0.87 and 0.87 for the 3D-CRT, SaS-IMRT and HT plans, respectively. The mean homogeneity index was 1.08, 1.10 and 1.07. The mean ID to rectum, bladder, small bowel and colon, and pelvic bones all decreased in the SaS-IMRT and HT plans (P < 0.05), compared with the 3D-CRT plans. The ID to normal tissue decreased 19.50 Gy-L in the SaS IMRT plans, increased 11.85 Gy-L in the HT plans. As compared to the SaS-IMRT, the mean ID to rectum, bladder further decreased 0.08 Gy-L and 0.51 Gy-L in the HT, while the ID to pelvic bones and normal tissue increased 1.65 Gy-L and 31.35 Gy-L. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 3D-CRT, SaS-IMRT and HT can improve the dose conformity for patients undergoing postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy, and decrease the ID to organs at risk. HT results in more homogeneous PTV dose distribution and decreased ID to rectum and bladder compared with SaS IMRT. The ID to normal tissue decrease in the SaS IMRT, and increase in the HT compared with the 3D-CRT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?