Dosimetric study of protecting bone marrow by intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy

XIAO Feng,LI Yun-hai,WANG Hong-lin,CHEN Jie,ZHAO Sen,DONG Hai-quan,LI Yong-chun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2013.03.008
2013-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment modality for patients with high-risk cervical cancer after hysterectomy.The delivery of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with radiotherapy improved survival compared with radiotherapy alone,but may be associated with high rates of acute hematologic toxicity.The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric benefits of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy(BMS-IMRT) compared with conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and three-dimension conformal radiation therapy(3D-CRT) techniques in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy.Methods: The four-field box 3D-CRT,IMRT and BMS-IMRT were generated on 10 cervical cancer patients after hysterectomy,which actually treated with BMS-IMRT techniques.The prescribed dose to the PTV was 45 Gy.All plans had 95% of PTV volume received the prescription.The organs at risk included bone marrow,small bowel,rectum,bladder and femoral head.All plans were created in the Pinnacle3(Version 9.2 f) and the final doses were calculated using the collapse cone superposition and convolution algorithm.The dosimetric comparisons of target and organs at risk were performed among the three techniques.Results: The PTV coverage in 3D-CRT,IMRT and BMS-IMRT plans was similar(P>0.05).The BMS-IMRT reduced the bone marrow V5(volume receiving 5 Gy),V10,V20,V30,V40 and V20,V30,V40,compared to the 3D-CRT and IMRT,respectively(P<0.05).For the small bowel,bladder and rectum,no statistically significant dose differences were found between BMS-IMRT and IMRT(P>0.05).Conclusion: For patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy,the BMS-IMRT is superior to the IMRT and 3D-CRT in reducing dose to bone marrow volume.The IMRT with bone marrow sparing may reduce acute hematologic toxicities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?