Dosimetric Study of Three Different Techniques in Postoperative Adjuvant Irradiation of Rectal Cancer

QIAN Li-ting,JIN Da-wei,LIU Xin-fan,LI Ye-xiong,SONG Yong-wen,YU Zi-hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1004-4221.2005.06.005
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the dose-volume histogram of small bowel,bladder and femoral head under conventional radiotherapy(CRT),three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) in postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.Methods 1.With definition of CTV identical in all three techniques,PTV=CTV+1?cm was set.2.The dose distribution of conventional method by which the dose was delivered through a threefield technique(0°,90°,270°,in prone position) was evaluated by 3-demensional planning system.3.The dose-volume histogram of small bowel,bladder and femoral head under CRT,3-DCRT and IMRT were compared after the treatment planning became satisfactory to the criteria of ≥95% of PTV on prescription dose.Results 1.The advantage of conventional method was the small bowel,bladder and femoral heads which received lower dose,at the expense of poor coverage of PTV.2. The volume of normal tissue under high isodose cure was: IMRT 3DCRT CRT.3. The volume of small bowel and bladder under high isodose curve was similar when comparing three-field 3DCRT with 5-field 3DCRT.However,7-field 3DCRT technique increased this figure when it was compared with 3 or 5-field technique.Seven-field IMRT technique was as good as 9-field in normal tissue sparing.Conclusions Target coverage is unstatisfactory with the conventional method in postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.Three-or 5-field 3DCRT and 7field IMRT technique are suitable.With similar target coverage,IMRT is superior to other modalities in normal tissue sparing,especially in protecting the bladder.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?