Dosimetry Studies of Three Different Radiotherapy Technology for Prostate Cancer

ZHU Hong,LI Zhao-bin,WANG Hong-lin,FU Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8194.2012.34.026

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the dosimetry differences of conventional radiotherapy(CRT),three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT) and simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy(SMART) in treatment planning of prostate cancer including pelvic cavity prophylactic irradiation.Methods The planning CT scans of ten patients with prostate cancer with staging of T2-3N0M0 were used to generate CRT、3D-CRT and SMART plans for this study.Target volume and organ at risk were contoured on the individual axial CT slices.Three different treatment plannings were designed for each patient with a prescription dose of 70Gy to prostate and seminal vesicle and 50Gy to pelvic lymph node.The following parameters of plannings were compared in each patient:isodose distributions line,dose-volume histogram(DVH),Dmax,Dmin,Dmean,V95%,CI(radiation conformal index,CI)、HI(relative dose homogeneity index,HI)and the dose to related critical organs.Results SMART showed better dose uniformity and conformity than 3D-CRT and CRT,and 3D-CRT was superior to CRT except in PTV1(P<0.05).SMART was superior to 3D-CRT,and 3D-CRT was superior to CRT in sparing rectum and femoral head(P<0.05).SMART was superior to 3D-CRT and 3D-CRT in sparing bladder(P <0.05).But the dose received by the intestine and colon were not significant different(P<0.05).Conclusion Considering the target volume and critical organs,plans of SMART were superior to 3D-CRT and 3D-CRT were superior to CRT.SMART showed advantages in prostate cancer radiotherapy with nodal treatment.