A pilot study on the rationality and reliability of objective structured clinical examination in ophthalmology

Xue-min LI,Zi-yuan LIU,Wei WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2011.01.052
2011-01-01
Abstract:The aim of this research is to evaluate the strength and weakness of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) as an assessment method in the course of ophthalmology. 95 Students from the Health Science Center of Peking University took ophthalmology OSCE and were given a questionnaire comparing OSCE and traditional written-test. The results showed that students spent their time quite differently in these two situations with a more rational time allocation in OSCE. No significant knowledge comprehension difference was found between them. Also, students felt more interested in study and less stressed under OSCE. Lastly, students thought OSCE covered more knowledge and felt the test was less difficult than written-test. OSCE is a rational and reliable evaluation tool in medical education.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?