Scoring consistency of standard patients and examiners in the developed dental OSCE system

Feng Zhu,Li Wu,Xiuxiu Shao,Lijuan Huang,Xiangfeng Meng,Rongrong Nie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2024055/v1

2022-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Objective This study aimed to investigate the use of standard patients (SPs) and examiners as assessors for scoring in the developed dental objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) system and to evaluate scoring differences between them. Methods The doctor–patient communication and clinical examination station in the OSCE examination system was developed. The examination time of this station was 10 min, and the examination institution wrote the script and recruited SPs. A total of 146 examinees receiving standardized training at the Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, from 2018 to 2021 were assessed. The same examinee was scored by SPs and examiners according to the same scoring rubrics. Subsequently, the SPSS software was used to analyze the examination results of different assessors and evaluate their correlation. Results The average score of all examinees at this station was 90.45 ± 3.52 by SPs and 91.53 ± 4.13 by examiners. A significant positive correlation was found between their scores, with a correlation coefficient of 0.746. Thus, the assessors had good reliability and higher consistency. Conclusions It was feasible to use SPs directly as assessors. They could provide a simulated and realistic clinical setting and create favorable conditions for comprehensive competence training and improvement for medical students during school.