Comparative Study of Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction Using Different Types of End-to-side Neurorrhaphy

YANG Weng-bo,YU Gong,CHEN Lin,YANG Jian-yun,WU Ke-wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054x.2010.04.014
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the curative effect of standard end-to-side neurorrhaphy and other modifications. Methods A total of 126 SD rats were randomized into 7 groups. The right musculocutaneous nerves were transected in all animals. The ipsilateral ulnar nerve served as the donor nerve. In group 1 the ulnar nerve and musculocutaneous nerve were coaptated in an end-to-end fashion. In group 2, the musculocutaneous nerve was coapted with ulnar nerve in the standard end-to-side fashion. Side-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without an epineural window were undergone in group 3 and 4, respectively. In group 5 and 6, the recipient nerve was coapted with the donor nerve in a helicoid pattern, with and without removal of the epineurium,respectively. The musculocutaneous nerve in group 7 was transected but not reconstructed to serve as control.Electrophysiological and histological analyses were performed in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd month postoperatively.Results By the end of the 3rd month postoperatively, regenerative signs were observed in all end-to-side neurorrhaphy groups. The curative effect of end-to-side coaptation was not as satisfactory as that of end-to-end neurorrhaphy. There was no significant difference among the end-to-side neurorrhaphy groups( P > 0.05). The most unsatisfactory result was observed in groups without removal of the epineural sheath. Conclusion Epineurium had negative impact to nerve regeneration after end-to-side neurorraphy. There was no significant difference among various end-to-side coaptation patterns. Modification of surgical end-to-side neurorrhaphy techniques has limited effect on improving nerve regeneration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?