Evaluating the effects of different peroneal neurorrhaphies on functional recovery by nerve function index

秦荣生,李健宁,赵一鸣,秦泽莲,马勇光,王侠,牛星焘,李东
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2004.16.051
2004-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The reliability of nerve function index(NFI) for evaluating functional recovery following rat sciatic nerve injury has been confirmed by many researches; moreover, NFI has been commonly used to assess functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury and its branches injuries in rat model.OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of different peroneal neurorrhaphy on nerve function recovery by NFI.DESIGN: A randomised case-control study.SETTINGS and MATERIALS: The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Animal laboratory of Peking University Health Siences Center. Totally twenty SD rats were used.METHODS: All rats were randomly divided into two groups after removing a small epineural window at tibial nerve (TN) that used as donor nerve. The distal end of PN was sutured to the lateral face of the TN in group A, while PN and TN were reinnervated by side -to-side neurorraphy in group B. Footprint analysis was used to calculate Peroneal nerve function index(NFI) of the two groups at 3, 6, 11, 16 weeks after operation,and the difference of PFI between two groups was compared with t test.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The difference of PFI between two groups at different postoperative time points.RESULTS: PFI was - 39. 92 + 11.67 in group A at 6th week postoperatively, significantly different from -64.49 +31.31 of group B, (t = -2. 315,P = 0. 033) PFI was - 27.43 ± 12.54 in group A and - 15.66 ± 9.81 in group B at 16 weeks postoperatively, with significant difference( t = 2. 314,P=0. 048).CONCLUSION: Side-to-side reinnervation by PN and TN was superior to distallateral neurorraphy for nerve functional recovery at 16 weeks after PN operation in rat models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?