Experimental Study of End-to-side Neurorraphy after Different Intervals of Delayed Repair

YANG Weng-bo,YU Cong,CHEN Lin,YANG Jian-yun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054x.2011.03.016
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the influence of different intervals of delayed repair on end-to-side neurorraphy and to discuss the possible reasons of the disparity between the experimental studies and the clinical applications. Methods Thirty female SD rats were subjected to musculocutaneous nerve transection and randomized into 5 groups. The musculocutaneous nerves were reconstructed in the end-to-side fashion with the ipsilateral ulnar nerve at different intervals of delay. No delay (0 d repair),1 week delay (7 d repair),3 week delay (21 d repair),6 week delay (42 d repair) and no repair (control) were the group assignments. Electrophysiological and histological examinations were carried out 3 months after the repair surgery. Results Evaluations conducted 3 months postoperatively showed that the 1-week delay group performed significantly better in electrophysiological and histological examinations than the other groups. There was no noticeable difference between no delay group and 3-week delay group in some tests. The outcomes were decreased in the 6-week delay group,which were significantly different from the other groups (P<0.05). Conclusion The interval of delayed repair can influence the effectiveness of end-to-side neurorraphy after nerve injuries. The outcomes of the surgery were better after 1-week nerve pre-degeneration. However the therapeutic effect of end-to-side coaptation decreased with the pass of time. Aggravation of muscle atrophy might be one of the possible reasons to explain the incompatible results between the experimental studies and the clinical applications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?