Reconstruction of Elbow Flexion by End-to-Side Neurorrhaphy in Phrenic Nerve Transfer
Mou‐Xiong Zheng,Wendong Xu,Yundong Shen,Jian‐Guang Xu,Yajia Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182419c00
2012-01-01
Abstract:Sir:FigurePhrenic nerve transfer has been widely used in the treatment of brachial plexus avulsion injuries and has been one of the options for reconstruction of elbow flexion, with biceps strength of M3 or better at 84.6 percent recovery.1,2 However, concerns regarding potential pulmonary function problems have limited its popularization.3 Therefore, we considered balancing the restoration of the affected limb and preventing denervation of the ipsilateral diaphragm by end-to-side neurorrhaphy. In the current study, five consecutive patients (three male patients and two female patients) with brachial plexus avulsion injuries, aged from 6 to 36 years (mean, 18.6 years), were admitted to our hospital and underwent phrenic nerve transfer with end-to-side neurorrhaphy by neurotizing the anterior division of the upper trunk or the musculocutaneous nerve. The operative delay after injury was 1 to 6 months (mean, 2.5 months). In the surgical process, the distal end of the musculocutaneous nerve or anterior division of the upper trunk was sutured to the grafted sural nerve with end-to-end neurorrhaphy, and the other end of the graft was sutured to the side of the phrenic nerve in “helicoid fashion” at the level of the C6 nerve root using 9-0 polypropylene sutures. In the helicoid fashion, the proximal end of the graft was wrapped around the longitudinal axis of the phrenic nerve and sutured to the side of the phrenic nerve with an end-to-side neurorrhaphy, and the epineurium of the phrenic nerve was removed at the site of coaptation (Fig. 1). At the final visit at 2 years, all patients had regained various degrees of biceps strength (M4 in two patients, M3 in one patient, M2 in one patient, and M1 in one patient). The average prolongation of latency of the phrenic nerve was 2.88 msec, and the average decrease of amplitude from the preoperative value was 32.4 percent. However, compared with the preoperative status, none of these five patients suffered from diaphragm elevation or decreased diaphragm excursion. The pulmonary function test values forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second had all recovered to preoperative levels, and some values had even improved from preoperative values (Fig. 2).Fig. 1: Intraoperative photograph shows “helicoid coaptation” in the end-to-side neurorrhaphy in phrenic nerve transfer. After an epineurial window was made on the lateral surface of phrenic nerve (PN), the distal stump of the musculocutaneous nerve was coapted to the lateral phrenic nerve by means of a 7-cm sural nerve (SN) graft using an 8-0 polypropylene suture. The proximal end of the graft was coapted to the phrenic nerve after spirally winding 2.5 cycles along the phrenic nerve to enlarge the contact area (arrow).Fig. 2: Diagram shows comparison of the forced vital capacity (FVC) before and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery in the five patients.Although the efficacy of end-to-side neurorrhaphy was reported lower than for end-to-end neurorrhaphy, the phrenic nerve could still provide motor recovery for elbow flexion even with an end-to-side neurorrhaphy.4 The phrenic nerve is composed mainly of myelinated motor nerve fibers and discharges spontaneous impulses that could be stimulated by deep breathing.5 These features might contribute to its superior regeneration capacity. Electrophysiologic studies suggested diaphragm elevation or excursion limitation. The suturing procedure or the winding technique might be the reason for abnormality of the phrenic nerve in the nerve conduction study. However, function of the diaphragm could be preserved. In conclusion, phrenic nerve transfer with end-to-side neurorrhaphy is capable of providing functional biceps recovery in a majority of patients, with preservation of diaphragm function (Table 1).Table 1: Characteristics of the Five Patients and Results of the Elbow Flexion Function and Pulmonary Function TestsMou-Xiong Zheng, M.D. Department of Hand Surgery, Hua-Shan Hospital, Fudan University, and, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve Microsurgery Wen-Dong Xu, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Hand Surgery, Hua-Shan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve Microsurgery, and, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University Yun-Dong Shen, M.D., Ph.D. Jian-Guang Xu, M.D., Ph.D. Yu-Dong Gu, M.D. Department of Hand Surgery, Hua-Shan Hospital, Fudan University, and, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve Microsurgery, Shanghai, People's Republic of China ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by Chinese National Basic Research Program grant no. 2003CB515300; “Dawn” Program of Shanghai Education Commission, China, grant no. 06SG04; and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, China, grant no. NCET-07-0209. DISCLOSURE The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.