Abstract:We evaluated the repositioning accuracy of a commercially available stereotactic whole body immobilization system (BodyFIX, Medical Intelligence, Schwabmuenchen, Germany) in 36 patients treated by hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy. CT data were acquired for positional control of patient and tumor before each fraction of the treatment course. Those control CT datasets were compared with the original treatment planning CT simulation and analyzed with respect to positional misalignment of bony patient anatomy, and the respective position of the treated small lung or liver lesions. We assessed the stereotactic coordinates of distinct bony anatomical landmarks in the original CT and each control dataset. In addition, the target isocenter was recorded in the planning CT simulation dataset. An iterative optimization algorithm was implemented, utilizing a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomical landmark measurements relative to the original treatment planning CT data set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y and z-components of translation of the patient's body and the target's center-of-mass for each control CT study, as well as rotation about the principal room axes in the respective CT data sets. In addition to absolute patient/target translation, the total magnitude vector of patient and target misalignment was calculated. A clinical assessment determined whether or not the assigned planning target volume safety margins would have provided the desired target coverage. To this end, each control CT study was co-registered with the original treatment planning study using immobilization system related fiducial markers, and the computed isodose calculation was superimposed. In 109 control setup CT scans available for comparison with their respective treatment planning CT simulation study (2-5 per patient, median 3), anatomical landmark analysis revealed a mean bony landmark translation of -0.4 +/- 3.9 (mean +/- SD), -0.1 +/- 1.6 and 0.3 +/- 3.6 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. Bony landmark setup deviations along one or more principal axis larger than 5 mm were observed in 32 control CT studies (29.4%). Body rotations about the x-, y- and z-axis were 0.9 +/- 0.7, 0.8 +/- 0.7 and 1.8 +/- 1.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming a rigid body relationship of target and bony anatomy, the mean computed absolute target translation was 2.9 +/- 3.3, 2.3 +/- 2.5 and 3.2 +/- 2.7 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. The median and mean magnitude vector of target isocenter displacement was computed to be 4.9 mm, and 5.7 +/- 3.7 mm. Clinical assessment of PTV/target volume coverage revealed 72 (66.1%), 23 (21.1%), and 14 (12.8%), of excellent (100% isodose coverage), good (>90% isodose coverage), and poor GTV/isodose alignment quality (less than 90% isodose coverage to some aspect of the GTV), respectively. Loss of target volume dose coverage was correlated with translations >5 mm along one or more axes (p<0.0001), rotations >3 degrees about the z-axis (p=0.0007) and body mass index >30 (p<0.0001). The analyzed BodyFIX whole body immobilization system performed favorably compared with other stereotactic body immobilization systems for which peer-reviewed repositioning data exist. While the measured variability in patient and target setup provided clinically acceptable setup accuracy in the vast majority of cases, larger setup deviations were occasional observed. Such deviations constitute a potential for partial target underdosing warranting, in our opinion, a pre-delivery positional assessment procedure (e.g., pre-treatment control CT scan).

Comparison of setup accuracy between Catalyst HD and skin markers in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

A Comparison of Patient Position Displacements from Catalyst™ System and Cone Beam CT Registrations for Treatment

Skin marker combined with surface‐guided auto‐positioning for breast DIBH radiotherapy daily initial patient setup: An optimal schedule for both accuracy and efficiency

Positioning accuracy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy patients determined by on-treatment cone-beam CT imaging

Dosimetric Benefit of Implanted Marker-Based Cbct Setup for Definitive Prostatic Radiotherapy

Comparative Analysis Ofapplication Value and Setup Error Between Two Setup Methods in Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Application of optical surface monitoring system(OSMS) during postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients immobilized with neck and thorax thermoplastic mask

Choice of immobilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung tumor patient by BMI

The use of IGRT technique to measure the target position errors in SBRT treatment for lung cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of 192ir Sources Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy by Coplanar Template Assisted CT Guidance and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer

Comparison of the Performance of Two Methods to Determine Set-Up Errors for DIBH Patients with Left Sided Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy

Analysis of Target Location Errors in Radiation Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Active Breathing Control System

Difference in target dose distributions between Acuros XB and collapsed cone convolution/superposition and the impact of the tumor locations in clinical cases of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for lung cancer

Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available double-vacuum whole body immobilization system for stereotactic body radiation therapy

Comparison between supine and prone patient setup for lumbosacral spinal stereotactic body radiosurgery with CyberKnife

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of on board imaging with cone beam CT using target registration in patients with lung tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy and comparison with ExacTrac using skeletal registration on Novalis Tx

Initial clinical experience of surface guided stereotactic radiation therapy with open-face mask immobilization for improving setup accuracy: a retrospective study

Comparison of setup accuracy and efficiency between the Klarity system and BodyFIX system for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System

Comparative analysis of dose calculation algorithms for CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy in lung cancer