Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)To evaluate the positioning accuracy of four different immobilizations using cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials/MethodsSixty-seven patients with NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy, 30 were immobilized with thermoplastic frame and normal breathing (TF), 16 with thermoplastic frame and active breathing control (TF-ABC), 7 with stereotactic body frame and normal breathing (SBF), 14 with stereotactic body frame and ABC (SBF-ABC). CBCT was scanned at initial setup and after correction, registered to planning CT, the errors of isocenter position on the left-to-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed.ResultsBefore correction, the mean errors were <1mm for normal breathing (NB), there is no significant difference between TF and SBF (p>0.05). The pre-correction mean errors ranged -0.5 to -2.0 mm for ABC. The initial error of TF-ABC in the LR direction was significantly larger than that of TF (p<0.05). The initial error of SBF-ABC in the AP direction was significantly larger than that of SBF (p<0.05). After correction, the errors were reduced in all directions for the four immobilizations; the PTV margin was reduced for a magnitude of 9 -10 mm in NB and 5 -10 mm in ABC. Using ABC reduced ITV with a magnitude of 4.1 mm.ConclusionsCBCT online correction improved the positioning accuracy of NSCLC patients. The positioning accuracy of stereotactic body frame and thermoplastic frame were similar. ABC increased positioning error but reduced internal margin. Purpose/Objective(s)To evaluate the positioning accuracy of four different immobilizations using cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To evaluate the positioning accuracy of four different immobilizations using cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials/MethodsSixty-seven patients with NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy, 30 were immobilized with thermoplastic frame and normal breathing (TF), 16 with thermoplastic frame and active breathing control (TF-ABC), 7 with stereotactic body frame and normal breathing (SBF), 14 with stereotactic body frame and ABC (SBF-ABC). CBCT was scanned at initial setup and after correction, registered to planning CT, the errors of isocenter position on the left-to-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients with NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy, 30 were immobilized with thermoplastic frame and normal breathing (TF), 16 with thermoplastic frame and active breathing control (TF-ABC), 7 with stereotactic body frame and normal breathing (SBF), 14 with stereotactic body frame and ABC (SBF-ABC). CBCT was scanned at initial setup and after correction, registered to planning CT, the errors of isocenter position on the left-to-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed. ResultsBefore correction, the mean errors were <1mm for normal breathing (NB), there is no significant difference between TF and SBF (p>0.05). The pre-correction mean errors ranged -0.5 to -2.0 mm for ABC. The initial error of TF-ABC in the LR direction was significantly larger than that of TF (p<0.05). The initial error of SBF-ABC in the AP direction was significantly larger than that of SBF (p<0.05). After correction, the errors were reduced in all directions for the four immobilizations; the PTV margin was reduced for a magnitude of 9 -10 mm in NB and 5 -10 mm in ABC. Using ABC reduced ITV with a magnitude of 4.1 mm. Before correction, the mean errors were <1mm for normal breathing (NB), there is no significant difference between TF and SBF (p>0.05). The pre-correction mean errors ranged -0.5 to -2.0 mm for ABC. The initial error of TF-ABC in the LR direction was significantly larger than that of TF (p<0.05). The initial error of SBF-ABC in the AP direction was significantly larger than that of SBF (p<0.05). After correction, the errors were reduced in all directions for the four immobilizations; the PTV margin was reduced for a magnitude of 9 -10 mm in NB and 5 -10 mm in ABC. Using ABC reduced ITV with a magnitude of 4.1 mm. ConclusionsCBCT online correction improved the positioning accuracy of NSCLC patients. The positioning accuracy of stereotactic body frame and thermoplastic frame were similar. ABC increased positioning error but reduced internal margin. CBCT online correction improved the positioning accuracy of NSCLC patients. The positioning accuracy of stereotactic body frame and thermoplastic frame were similar. ABC increased positioning error but reduced internal margin.

A Comparison of Patient Position Displacements from Catalyst™ System and Cone Beam CT Registrations for Treatment

Clinical application of Catalyst system in cervical cancer radiotherapy

Catalyst System in Patient Positioning During Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Clinical Application and Influencing Factors

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of on board imaging with cone beam CT using target registration in patients with lung tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy and comparison with ExacTrac using skeletal registration on Novalis Tx

Comparison of setup accuracy between Catalyst HD and skin markers in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer

Assessment of fiducial motion in CBCT projections of the abdominal tumor using template matching and sequential stereo triangulation

Evaluation of Positioning Accuracy of Four Different Immobilizations Using Cone-Beam Ct in Radiotherapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Dosimetric Benefit of Implanted Marker-Based Cbct Setup for Definitive Prostatic Radiotherapy

Pediatric Cone Beam CT on Varian Halcyon and TrueBeam Radiotherapy Systems: Radiation Dose and Positioning Accuracy Evaluations.

Clinical Validation of two Surface Imaging Systems for Patient Positioning in Percutaneous Radiotherapy

Dosimetric Verification Of Lung Cancer Treatment Using The Cbcts Estimated From Limited-Angle On-Board Projections

SU-GG-J-109: A Study on Image Guided Radiotherapy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for Head and Neck Cancer IMRT Patient Setup

A New Method For Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Computed Tomography

Lung Cancer Positioning Accuracy Evaluated by CBCT

Effects of Irregular Respiratory Motion on the Positioning Accuracy of Moving Target with Free Breathing Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography.

Research on the Precision and Stability of Optical Surface Imaging Technology in Guiding Radiotherapy Positioning

A comparision of three imaging modalities in image-guided radiotherapy

Detection of Intrafractional Tumour Position Error in Radiotherapy Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Use of Calibrated CBCT on Clinical Workflow to Assess the Delivered Dose for Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer

Tumor localization using cone-beam CT reduces setup margins in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors

Gamma Knife® icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame-based treatment