Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)To evaluate the positioning accuracy of four different immobilizations using cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials/MethodsSixty-seven patients with NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy, 30 were immobilized with thermoplastic frame and normal breathing (TF), 16 with thermoplastic frame and active breathing control (TF-ABC), 7 with stereotactic body frame and normal breathing (SBF), 14 with stereotactic body frame and ABC (SBF-ABC). CBCT was scanned at initial setup and after correction, registered to planning CT, the errors of isocenter position on the left-to-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed.ResultsBefore correction, the mean errors were <1mm for normal breathing (NB), there is no significant difference between TF and SBF (p>0.05). The pre-correction mean errors ranged -0.5 to -2.0 mm for ABC. The initial error of TF-ABC in the LR direction was significantly larger than that of TF (p<0.05). The initial error of SBF-ABC in the AP direction was significantly larger than that of SBF (p<0.05). After correction, the errors were reduced in all directions for the four immobilizations; the PTV margin was reduced for a magnitude of 9 -10 mm in NB and 5 -10 mm in ABC. Using ABC reduced ITV with a magnitude of 4.1 mm.ConclusionsCBCT online correction improved the positioning accuracy of NSCLC patients. The positioning accuracy of stereotactic body frame and thermoplastic frame were similar. ABC increased positioning error but reduced internal margin. Purpose/Objective(s)To evaluate the positioning accuracy of four different immobilizations using cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To evaluate the positioning accuracy of four different immobilizations using cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials/MethodsSixty-seven patients with NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy, 30 were immobilized with thermoplastic frame and normal breathing (TF), 16 with thermoplastic frame and active breathing control (TF-ABC), 7 with stereotactic body frame and normal breathing (SBF), 14 with stereotactic body frame and ABC (SBF-ABC). CBCT was scanned at initial setup and after correction, registered to planning CT, the errors of isocenter position on the left-to-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients with NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy, 30 were immobilized with thermoplastic frame and normal breathing (TF), 16 with thermoplastic frame and active breathing control (TF-ABC), 7 with stereotactic body frame and normal breathing (SBF), 14 with stereotactic body frame and ABC (SBF-ABC). CBCT was scanned at initial setup and after correction, registered to planning CT, the errors of isocenter position on the left-to-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed. ResultsBefore correction, the mean errors were <1mm for normal breathing (NB), there is no significant difference between TF and SBF (p>0.05). The pre-correction mean errors ranged -0.5 to -2.0 mm for ABC. The initial error of TF-ABC in the LR direction was significantly larger than that of TF (p<0.05). The initial error of SBF-ABC in the AP direction was significantly larger than that of SBF (p<0.05). After correction, the errors were reduced in all directions for the four immobilizations; the PTV margin was reduced for a magnitude of 9 -10 mm in NB and 5 -10 mm in ABC. Using ABC reduced ITV with a magnitude of 4.1 mm. Before correction, the mean errors were <1mm for normal breathing (NB), there is no significant difference between TF and SBF (p>0.05). The pre-correction mean errors ranged -0.5 to -2.0 mm for ABC. The initial error of TF-ABC in the LR direction was significantly larger than that of TF (p<0.05). The initial error of SBF-ABC in the AP direction was significantly larger than that of SBF (p<0.05). After correction, the errors were reduced in all directions for the four immobilizations; the PTV margin was reduced for a magnitude of 9 -10 mm in NB and 5 -10 mm in ABC. Using ABC reduced ITV with a magnitude of 4.1 mm. ConclusionsCBCT online correction improved the positioning accuracy of NSCLC patients. The positioning accuracy of stereotactic body frame and thermoplastic frame were similar. ABC increased positioning error but reduced internal margin. CBCT online correction improved the positioning accuracy of NSCLC patients. The positioning accuracy of stereotactic body frame and thermoplastic frame were similar. ABC increased positioning error but reduced internal margin.

Positioning accuracy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy patients determined by on-treatment cone-beam CT imaging

Evaluation of Positioning Accuracy of Four Different Immobilizations Using Cone-Beam Ct in Radiotherapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available double-vacuum whole body immobilization system for stereotactic body radiation therapy

Lung Cancer Positioning Accuracy Evaluated by CBCT

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of on board imaging with cone beam CT using target registration in patients with lung tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy and comparison with ExacTrac using skeletal registration on Novalis Tx

Detection of Intrafractional Tumour Position Error in Radiotherapy Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Interfractional and Intrafractional Errors in Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

The use of IGRT technique to measure the target position errors in SBRT treatment for lung cancer

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Evaluation of kidney motion and target localization in abdominal SBRT patients

Assessment of fiducial motion in CBCT projections of the abdominal tumor using template matching and sequential stereo triangulation

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors with Online Cone Beam CT Guidance and Active Breathing Control

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System

Tumor localization using cone-beam CT reduces setup margins in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors

Reducing ExacTrac intrafraction imaging uncertainty for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy using a pre-treatment CBCT

Online Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Ct Guided Lung Cancer Radiation: Initial Clinical Experiences From Shanghai

Positioning Accuracy And Efficacy Of Different Correction Protocols Based On Kv-Cone Beam Ct Guidance For Abdominal Pelvic Radiation Therapy

Setup Errors Analysis and Quality Control in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Tumors

Dosimetric Verification Of Lung Cancer Treatment Using The Cbcts Estimated From Limited-Angle On-Board Projections

Inter- and intrafractional setup errors and baseline shifts of fiducial markers in patients with liver tumors receiving free-breathing postoperative radiation analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography.

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy