Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Primary comparison of the diagnostic value of strain ratio measure method and 5-scoring system in ultrasonic elestography for differentiation breast benign and malignant solid lesions with ultrasonic elastography

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method

Diagnostic Value of Strain Ratio for Differentiation Breast Benign and Malignant Solid Lesions with Ultrasonic Elastography

Comparison of Ultrasonic Elastic Strain Rate and Elastic Imaging Scoring Method in Application of Qualitative Diagnosis for Breast Masses

Comparative study of strain ratio method and scoring system in ultrasonic elestography for differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

Evaluation Stiff Rim Sign in Breast Lesions by Shear Wave Elastography with Quantative Values

Ultrasonic Scores of Conventional Ultrasound and Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodular Lesions

Value of Strain Ratio by Ultrasonic Elastography in Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in breast neoplasm

Semi-quantitating Stiffness of Breast Solid Lesions in Ultrasonic Elastography

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Clinical application of ultrasound elastography hardness score and area ratio in the diffierential diagnosis of breast lesions

Role Of Strain Elastography And Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Technique In The Diagnosis Of Breast Solid Lesions

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

Complex cystic and solid breast lesions: diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound, strain imaging and point shear wave speed measurement.

Role of Sonoelastography Using 5-Point Scoring Method and Strain Ratio in Improving Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasound in Indeterminate BI-RADS 3 and 4 Breast Lesions

The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions

Combination of acoustic radiation force impulse technology and three-dimensional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of breast lessions

The Assessment of Coner bute Value of Breast Disease with Ultrasound Elastography Imaging for the BI-RADS-US Categories